Lorn Potter wrote:
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>> (Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been
>> a
>> long time since we had this argument :-)
>>
>> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
>>> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Yeah,
that's
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> (Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been a
> long time since we had this argument :-)
>
> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
>> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>>> Yeah,
>>>
>>> that's pretty sad. They should have pi
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 00:17:26 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander
> said:
Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> On May 11, 200
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 00:17:26 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander
said:
> > > Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> > > > On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander said:
> > Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> > > On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, D
On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander said:
> Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> > On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> Ok another api framework
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:30, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
wrote:
> That's Qt and they have inherited this style from Trolltech.
>
> The way Nokia has developed Maemo it was always about take it or leave it the
> way it is.
Looks like they want a framework for UI guys create UIs for Maemo!
[]s
Lewis/
Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
>> >> wrote:
>> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
>> guys, but which ha
On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
> > wrote:
> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
> we
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:34:18PM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
> web site. any clue any one?
Maybe we'll see an Intel SoC real soon now...
--
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:34:18PM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
> web site. any clue any one?
Maybe we'll see an Intel SoC real soon now...
--
(Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been a
long time since we had this argument :-)
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Yeah,
> >
> > that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
> >
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2009, at 3:04 PM, max wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter
>>> wrote:
max wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter
> wrote:
>> Levy
On 12/05/2009, at 3:04 PM, max wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter
>> wrote:
>>> max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter
wrote:
> Levy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
wrote:
> Yeah,
>
> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
> something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
> like NIH syndrome.
>
> Until now, trying to co-work with these guys
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> max wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
> wrote:
>> Yeah,
>>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
> max wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>>> Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
wrote:
> Yeah,
>
> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or e
max wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> Levy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
>>> wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in developm
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
> Levy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
>> wrote:
>>> Yeah,
>>>
>>> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
>>> something that is already in development for quite a while.
Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
> wrote:
>> Yeah,
>>
>> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
>> something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
>> like NIH syndrome.
>
> Someone is tryin
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Yeah,
>
> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
> something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
> like NIH syndrome.
kettle calling the pot black...
I always thought one of open source's strengths
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
wrote:
> Yeah,
>
> that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
> something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
> like NIH syndrome.
Someone is trying to make they use Pyneo on #
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
Until now, trying to co-work with these guys typically went like "yeah, you
can take our APIs, if you want. No, we don
2009/5/11 Carsten Haitzler :
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16:59 +0200 Nicola Mfb said:
>
>> 2009/5/11 tammaro "pamdirac" palombo :
>> > an android without the htc? :)
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ok another api framework for smartphon
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16:59 +0200 Nicola Mfb said:
> 2009/5/11 tammaro "pamdirac" palombo :
> > an android without the htc? :)
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
> >> guys,
any reference on that in the
> > web site. any clue any one?
> >
> > 2009/5/11 Jeffrey Ratcliffe :
> > > -- Forwarded message ------
> > > From: Aki Niemi
> > > Date: 2009/5/11
> > > Subject: [Announce] Intel a
2009/5/11 tammaro "pamdirac" palombo :
> an android without the htc? :)
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
>> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
>> we
te. any clue any one?
>
> 2009/5/11 Jeffrey Ratcliffe :
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Aki Niemi
> > Date: 2009/5/11
> > Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
> > project (oFono)
> > To: debian-de...@lists.d
ubject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
> project (oFono)
> To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann
>
>
> Intel and Nokia are pleased to jointly announce the oFono project
> (http://ofono.org), an open source project for developi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aki Niemi
Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
project (oFono)
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann
Intel and Nokia are pleased to jointly announce the oFono project
(http://ofono.org
30 matches
Mail list logo
