I haven't missed any calls yet.
However, when i suspend manually (pressing the power button)
and want to wake the phone up manually, it turns on for half a second and
than off again. I always need to press the power button again.
(Also, it doesn't seem to make much difference)
qtextended an one
On Tuesday 28 Oct 2008 1:43:09 pm Richy wrote:
qtextended an one mwester-kernel had standby-time of several days, if you
never turn on wifi
My experience matches this and it gives me hope that it is indeed possible to
make the FR battery last longer. Typically, with about 10-15 mins of talking
Oh. So that's why qtopia always loses that data. I thought it was related to
reflashing and wondered why, because it has it's db on the sd card... *g*
Marcel
Am Tuesday 28 October 2008 00:53:59 schrieb W.Kenworthy:
because when the phone suspends you lose calls/sms messages ...
BillK
On
David Samblas wrote:
Marc, those it need to update the modules too?
Well, if you use them yes. I've not made a package with them since I
generally don't use extra modules :P
--
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/
___
Openmoko
I did the mwester and then booted and untarred the mwester modules and
rebooted. It has been stable (with suspend turned off), although the
battery life on mine seems to be just a few hours between being plugged in
(without usage).
I'm going to monitor it today to see if I can get a more precise
Wow, so 3.5 hours into the battery test and its down to 1 bar.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Geoff Ruscoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I did the mwester and then booted and untarred the mwester modules and
rebooted. It has been stable (with suspend turned off), although the
battery life on
Why do you all turn off suspend?
I can clearly understand (and I do this also) that autosuspend is a mess if
you're just playin round in ssh and the phone suspends all the time. But it
basically _works_ if you want it to, doesn't it?
I'm asking because I hear this everywhere and suspend works
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Geoff Ruscoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Wow, so 3.5 hours into the battery test and its down to 1 bar.
So the final result was 4.0 hours from full charge to 0 bars and then
plugged in back in at 5 hrs...
___
Openmoko
Wow, so 3.5 hours into the battery test and its down to 1 bar.
So the final result was 4.0 hours from full charge to 0 bars and then
plugged in back in at 5 hrs...
Did you leave the display on constantly? I have played around with stuff
like that, and making sure the display
because when the phone suspends you lose calls/sms messages ...
BillK
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 17:36 +0100, Marcel wrote:
Why do you all turn off suspend?
I can clearly understand (and I do this also) that autosuspend is a mess if
___
Openmoko
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Geoff Ruscoe wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Fabian Henze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this one:
http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=stable
I like the way you think! That would be great.
Are you saying you
For info, the site at ref[1] looks a shocker in firefox! Almost
unreadable fonts and dark colours on black are not a good choice ... or
look!
BillK
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 11:38 +0100, Alex Oberhauser wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Geoff Ruscoe wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at
Geoff Ruscoe ha scritto:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see
what kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
If you want, give a try to this [1]. It includes the latest cool patches
(better NAND performances, less power usage on LCD
Marc, those it need to update the modules too?
El lun, 27-10-2008 a las 00:47 +0100, Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
escribió:
Geoff Ruscoe ha scritto:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see
what kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
Hi Geeoff,
How does this relate to mwebster's kernel
http://moko.mwester.net/dl.html
Which one is more stable, latest and greatest?
Thanks,
Pander
David Samblas wrote:
Marc, those it need to update the modules too?
El lun, 27-10-2008 a las 00:47 +0100, Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
escribió:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see what
kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
Thanks
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Am Saturday 25 October 2008 16:13:27 schrieb Geoff Ruscoe:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see what
kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
Thanks
I'm using mwester's one. Seems to work well.
-marcel
On Sat, October 25, 2008 16:26, Marcel wrote:
Am Saturday 25 October 2008 16:13:27 schrieb Geoff Ruscoe:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see
what
kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
I'm using Om2008.8-update with latest FDOM
Am Saturday 25 October 2008 16:54:52 schrieb Pander:
On Sat, October 25, 2008 16:26, Marcel wrote:
Am Saturday 25 October 2008 16:13:27 schrieb Geoff Ruscoe:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see
what
kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:13:27 -0400
Geoff Ruscoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm downloading the new FDOM image, but unfortunately I don't see what
kernel I should use with it.
Is there a best kernel to go with it?
Thanks
Well , any kernel that works with om2008.9 :)
ideally ,
Hi all,
I am willing to put in effort in testing, bug fixing, developing and
impoving OM on FreeRunner. This would be a bit easier if it is clear what
exact combination of images is currently the latest stable (read usable)
in terms of this community. I understand this is not an easy question ;)
21 matches
Mail list logo
