[NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Dear Community, yes, you discovered us :D As the team leader of the Neophysis Dev Team I'm proud to announce you a new distribution for our loved(?) Freerunner. We started working on it on last September, with the support of the Italian Telefoninux.org community, and after 6 months (thursday w

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

djdas wrote: > What's next: who knows :P we're hardly working to achieve a stable phone > system, there are lots of programs in our OE buildsys but we haven't > provided a package manager yet (there is a script to simply install ipk > packages in /opt/bin/ipkmgr.sh) Hardly working or working hard?

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

On 6 March 2010 22:24, djdas wrote: > > As the team leader of the Neophysis Dev Team I'm proud to announce you a > new distribution for our loved(?) Freerunner. Well, of course it will be great to have another choice for the FR, if it is rock-solid and supports all the important phone functions.

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Hi Djdas, Thanks for the new FR software. I did try it just yet and ran into some problems. Where am i supposed to put the software? SD card? Nand? doesn;t matter? I put it on the Nand and flashed the kernel to Nand as well, but it doesn't boot at all. Having a choice is a good thing and if this

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

>We started working on it on last September, with the support of the >Italian Telefoninux.org community, and after 6 months (thursday was >our half-birthday :P) we want to share the effort of the 6 core >members of the team with you. thank you for the announcement. just tested the new image, feel

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:05:58 + Neil Jerram (NJ) wrote: >For me, it raises the question of why people feel that they need to >start off their own thing, instead of contributing to an existing >project. I think one justification for this is if the new project >really produces a result quickly t

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Brolin Empey wrote: > djdas wrote: > >> What's next: who knows :P we're hardly working to achieve a stable phone >> system, there are lots of programs in our OE buildsys but we haven't >> provided a package manager yet (there is a script to simply install ipk >> packages in /opt/bin/ipkmgr.sh) >

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Neil Jerram wrote: > On 6 March 2010 22:24, djdas wrote: > >> As the team leader of the Neophysis Dev Team I'm proud to announce you a >> new distribution for our loved(?) Freerunner. >> > > Well, of course it will be great to have another choice for the FR, if > it is rock-solid and suppo

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

djdas writes: > Honestly we didn't try GPRS functions yet, because we focused on the > phone part for the Armeniacum release, although oFono team implemented > the GPRS functions and the Calypso plugin already works with > multiplexing, so I assume there shouldn't be many problems. Nothing on

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Ed Kapitein wrote: > Hi Djdas, > > Thanks for the new FR software. > I did try it just yet and ran into some problems. > Where am i supposed to put the software? SD card? Nand? doesn;t matter? > I put it on the Nand and flashed the kernel to Nand as well, but it > doesn't boot at all. > I'm so

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > djdas writes: > >> Honestly we didn't try GPRS functions yet, because we focused on the >> phone part for the Armeniacum release, although oFono team implemented >> the GPRS functions and the Calypso plugin already works with >> multiplexing, so I assume there s

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

34sec bootup time sound's incredible compared to all other distros, WELL DONE!! Are there any screenshots available? Thanks! r -- | risto h. kurppa | risto at kurppa dot fi | http://risto.kurppa.fi ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Yes please some screenshots On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote: > 34sec bootup time sound's incredible compared to all other distros, WELL > DONE!! > > Are there any screenshots available? > > > Thanks! > > r > -- > | risto h. kurppa > | risto at kurppa dot fi > | http://rist

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Aditya Gandhi ha scritto: > Yes please some screenshots > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Risto H. Kurppa > wrote: > > 34sec bootup time sound's incredible compared to all other > distros, WELL DONE!! > > Are there any screenshots available? > > > Thanks!

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:28:02PM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote: > >We started working on it on last September, with the support of the > >Italian Telefoninux.org community, and after 6 months (thursday was > >our half-birthday :P) we want to share the effort of the 6 core > >members of the team with y

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

Why don't we really combine all efforts instead of making a huge and heavy fso which is indeed short of a good phone into something more specific and quicker. We are trying to make a desktop out of a phone, we should well concentrate on speed and reliability of operations we do. I don't think I wou

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Aditya Gandhi wrote: > Why don't we really combine all efforts instead of making a huge and heavy > fso which is indeed short of a good phone into something more specific and > quicker. IIRC, FSO is pretty quick to start...most of the time spent is for X, wm, etc

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

>On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Aditya Gandhi >wrote: >> Why don't we really combine all efforts instead of making a huge and >> heavy fso which is indeed short of a good phone into something more >> specific and quicker. >IIRC, FSO is pretty quick to start...most of the time spent is for X, >w

Re: [NEW DISTRIBUTION] Announcing NEOPhysis

On 10 March 2010 05:58, Aditya Gandhi wrote: > Why don't we really combine all efforts instead of making a huge and heavy > fso As others have replied, I don't think it's true that FSO is huge and heavy - at least, not in a practical sense, because it is nicely divided into separate functions, an