Joachim Ott wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 11:15, Patryk Benderz wrote:
>
>> Dnia 2010-11-24, śro o godzinie 09:56 +0100, Thibaut Girka pisze:
>>
>>> Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 à 09:18 +0100, Patryk Benderz a écrit :
>>>
Well, I do for example. Looking at the title of patent, i
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:57, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> i'd invent a new input method that doesn't violate the patent. take the
> principal and change it so its different enough not to violate. then implement
> that.
>
They've just released version 1.1 for free (1.0 was 1.50 price). Could
this m
Dnia 2010-11-24, śro o godzinie 09:56 +0100, Thibaut Girka pisze:
> Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 à 09:18 +0100, Patryk Benderz a écrit :
> > Well, I do for example. Looking at the title of patent, it seems that
> > 8pen is French based company. Following google hits I fount French
> > patent offic
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:54, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> if you wish to not violate a patent.. you simply have to give
> up on implementing the algorithm - or fight his patent in court first.
>
Very straight and plain...
what would you do in my place?
--
Daniele
___
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 23:53, Bryan Petty wrote:
> If your concern if that you have licensed Ken Perlin's patent, you're
> safe from any lawsuits from 8pen.
>
Actually my concern is about the implementation of the input method.
I've already pushed to my git repository a working GLP'd
implementa
--- On Tue, 11/23/10, Daniele Ricci wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan
> Petty
> wrote:
> > A patent (6031525) was already filed
> for
> > Quickwriting in 1999/2000:
> > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html
> >
> The
> patent office
> will realize it on its own, right?
Ther
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan Petty wrote:
> This is not true. A patent (6031525) was already filed for
> Quickwriting in 1999/2000:
> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html
>
> So if this is actually a duplicate patent, all Ken Perlin has to do is
> point out his patent to the paten
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote:
> Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> > themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such
> > data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures o
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:52, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> it's his idea. it's his job to defend it. he is the one who can. unless.. he's
> involved in 8pen as a founder/investor... then you're pushing poo uphill :)
>
Contacting him by phone is not something I can do, i don't speak
english very wel
Dnia 2010-11-23, wto o godzinie 09:13 +0100, Daniele Ricci pisze:
> Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data
> > from multiple sources and witness statements wi
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:14, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> you need documents from him - papers he's submitted, lectures given, anything
> else that proves he had the idea AND when it actually happened (before the
> filing of the patent). the patent filing proves that 8pen's invention happened
> at
Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data
> from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual paper,
> then you have something beginning to be bel
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:24 +0100, Daniele Ricci wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli wrote:
> > Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen
> > is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you
> > involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact th
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli wrote:
> Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen
> is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you
> involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact them?
>
> DaveMDS
>
I contacted the 8pen company: just one reply
14 matches
Mail list logo
