RE: Benchmarks

2007-07-07 Thread Simon Pickering
Oops. I took a look at your page of results, and noticed that the OMAP2420 didn't really perform all that well at floating point tests, despite its having a hardware VFP (vector floating point) unit. It then dawned on me that although I'd compiled nbench with hardware fp, it had been linked ag

Benchmarks

2007-07-05 Thread Simon Pickering
I presume the OMAP processors are comparable and of interest. Here are the results for the OMAP1710 (Nokia 770) and OMAP2420 (Nokia N800): Nokia 770 OMAP1710 Results == CFLAGS = -s -static -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall \ -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -falign-loops=2

Re: Benchmarks

2007-07-05 Thread rixed
I don't own a Neo yet, but I have here a Samsung S3C2440A (arm920 based), and here are the results : BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95) Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97) Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97) TEST: Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Ind

Benchmarks

2007-07-04 Thread thomas.cooksey
Hello all, Over at the SVHMPC, we have been benchmarking application processors. The main drive for this is that I have been working on a Freescale i.MX31 processor (based on an ARM11 core) and wanted to see how it performs compared to the competition. So far we have benchmarks for a 400Mhz