Excellent! Perhaps I'll be able to reuse/extend the work here for a
common backend, and then just write a Netbeans frontend to use it.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> --- On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Lally Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
--- On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Lally Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I was thinking about putting together a Netbeans plugin to dev for it.
| I'm wondering:
| 1. anyone want to use such a thing?
| 2. anyone wanna help?
\--
Try this?
https://projects.openmoko.org/projects/preity-plugi
Hi,
I want to use it with Ubuntu ;)
I'm new to the OM community, so I'm wondering if you are the first one
who want to build such thing. Isn't there any existing IDE integration
for the OM?
Lally Singh schrieb:
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
have a basic
Lally Singh ha scritto:
Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM.
I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that
a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the
emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you uploa
Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM.
I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that
a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the
emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you upload it to
your OM device, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know how fast your computer is, but i never had performance
issues. Even in a VMWare-Image my Eclipse worked very fine (and I don't
think I'm a slow hacker). The only thing, which can be slow is the
code-completion. But this can be deaktiva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Bastian
> Muck ha scritto:
>> Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I
>> don't have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
>> But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to writ
Bastian Muck ha scritto:
Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't
have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to
you. So when it's "finished" I will install Netbeans, too.
Co
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Oliver Uvman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesus! I thought I was the only one wanting to program CL on the OM.
> I've had lots of interesting ideas on how to use a gesture-based
> interface for writing CL, which could work only thanks to the sparse
> syntax, and p
I use vim, and it is the best IDE I have ever used:)
(My point is that it is impossible to get people to agree
on one IDE, since we all have different taste and needs)
--
Please don't send me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Join the FSF
PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
You're welcome to do so :-)
I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.
Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
> You're welcome to do so :-)
>
> I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
> respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
> Studio.
Note, please, that i said KDevelop 4, not KDevelop ;) There's a huge
differe
: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:19 PM
> To: List for Openmoko community discussion
>
>
> Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
>
>
> Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier
> & dumber about a lot of things. You e
2008 1:19 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier
& dumber about a lot of things. You end up spending a lot more time
fiddling with it to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't
have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to
you. So when it's "finished" I will insta
You're welcome to do so :-)
I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemen
Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented and is looking super-nifty by
now) :)
Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
> Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
> have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
> mapping.
>
> But, now that we're
12:08 PM
> To: List for Openmoko community discussion
> Subject: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
>
>
> Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
> have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskel
IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
mapping.
But, now that we're talking about development environments, who'd be
inter
liche Mail
Von: Lally Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: List for Openmoko community discussion
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 7. Mai 2008, 18:08:27 Uhr
Betreff: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
have a
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
mapping.
But, now that we're talking about development environments, who'd be
interested in using an IDE for developing OM?
I was thinking about putting together
Jesus! I thought I was the only one wanting to program CL on the OM.
I've had lots of interesting ideas on how to use a gesture-based
interface for writing CL, which could work only thanks to the sparse
syntax, and plan to make that some of the first things I program for
my OM. Hooray!
/Oliver Uvm
22 matches
Mail list logo
