Am Monday 13 October 2008 02:14:06 schrieb nickd:
Bummer. Upon further reading I see the difference in flash devices now.
Do you think UBIFS could replace JFFS on the Freerunner? Is there a
benefit? Or is there not enough wiggle room on the FR for caching? It
seems better overall [1]. Would it
The jffs filesystem used on the NAND is compressing, which is great for
our use case. For the SD that would also be very desirable (especially
with the provided 512MB µSD), but it seems that ext3 is the filesystem
of choice there. Has someone tried to use a compressing filesystem
there?
Hey, great to see you here Stefan!
The race for Emacs 23 on the Freerunner is on!
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The jffs filesystem used on the NAND is compressing, which is great for
our use case. For the SD that would also be very desirable (especially
with the provided 512MB
I haven't sorry. Coincidentaly, the new kernel which was released the
other day (.27) includes a new filesystem designed for flash drives -
UBIFS [1]. I wonder if this could be relevant to this project. It looks
like it has full write-back support, meaning it doesn't need to write to
the SD
nickd wrote:
I haven't sorry. Coincidentaly, the new kernel which was released the
other day (.27) includes a new filesystem designed for flash drives -
UBIFS [1]. I wonder if this could be relevant to this project. It looks
like it has full write-back support, meaning it doesn't need to
Bummer. Upon further reading I see the difference in flash devices now.
Do you think UBIFS could replace JFFS on the Freerunner? Is there a
benefit? Or is there not enough wiggle room on the FR for caching? It
seems better overall [1]. Would it be possible to replace it yourself
with the
6 matches
Mail list logo
