Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-14 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:05:53 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Joel Newkirk wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:44:34 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> wrote: >>> On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Rodney Myers wrote: >>> How does the default

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-14 Thread Rodney Myers
On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Joel Newkirk wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:44:34 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Rodney Myers wrote: How does the default WIFI work with open/free wifi access? Would I be able to get connected to the internet with a

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-14 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:44:34 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Rodney Myers wrote: > >> How does the default WIFI work with open/free wifi access? >> >> Would I be able to get connected to the internet with a wifi router >> that has dhcp working? >> >>

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-14 Thread Rodney Myers
On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Rodney Myers wrote: How does the default WIFI work with open/free wifi access? Would I be able to get connected to the internet with a wifi router that has dhcp working? I'd really like to get the OM functioning. Thanks I just attempted to log onto a wide open

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-14 Thread Rodney Myers
How does the default WIFI work with open/free wifi access? Would I be able to get connected to the internet with a wifi router that has dhcp working? I'd really like to get the OM functioning. Thanks ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 13:38:45 Joel Newkirk wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:57:07 +1100, "Sarton O'Brien" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 06:14:35 Joel Newkirk wrote: > >> PS: ipcalc is a handy tool...   > >> > >> $ ipcalc -b 192.168.1.20/29 > >> Address:   192.16

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:57:07 +1100, "Sarton O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 06:14:35 Joel Newkirk wrote: >> PS: ipcalc is a handy tool...   >> >> $ ipcalc -b 192.168.1.20/29 >> Address:   192.168.1.20         >> Netmask:   255.255.255.248 = 29 >> Wildcard:  0.0.0.7

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 06:14:35 Joel Newkirk wrote: > PS: ipcalc is a handy tool...   > > $ ipcalc -b 192.168.1.20/29 > Address:   192.168.1.20         > Netmask:   255.255.255.248 = 29 > Wildcard:  0.0.0.7               > => > Network:   192.168.1.16/29       > HostMin:   192.168.1.17        

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main problem is, I cannot ssh into the OM to make any changes. > > I cannot ping the OM, using 192.168.1.0 / 192.168.0.0 > > In the default setup, there is no "shell" icon anymore, so I am unable to > see what the IP ad

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Rodney Myers
The main problem is, I cannot ssh into the OM to make any changes. I cannot ping the OM, using 192.168.1.0 / 192.168.0.0 In the default setup, there is no "shell" icon anymore, so I am unable to see what the IP address really is. PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part _

USB networking problems with Ubuntu host (was RE: Default OM settings, no lan messed up)

2008-10-13 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:03:54 +, Matthias Camenzind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using 192.168.1.x for local network with internet acess and 192.168.0.202 > is my freerunner. I find no reason for this but sometimes internet acess > from FR won't work, then I run firestarter (a firewall out of t

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:04:34 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Joel Newkirk wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:10:28 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> wrote: >>> OS = OS X 10.5.5 >>> I was able to SSH into the OM. Once I did that, I edited

RE: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Matthias Camenzind
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: community@lists.openmoko.org > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:04:34 -0700 > Subject: Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up > > On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Joel Newkirk wrote: > >> On Mon,

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Rodney Myers
On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Joel Newkirk wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:10:28 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: OS = OS X 10.5.5 I received my OM this past week. Took some time to locate an ATT sim card that would work. Yesterday, I was able to follow the instructions at; htt

Re: Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:10:28 -0700, Rodney Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OS = OS X 10.5.5 > > I received my OM this past week. Took some time to locate an ATT sim > card that would work. > > Yesterday, I was able to follow the instructions at; > > http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/MacOS_X > >

Default OM settings, no lan messed up

2008-10-13 Thread Rodney Myers
OS = OS X 10.5.5 I received my OM this past week. Took some time to locate an ATT sim card that would work. Yesterday, I was able to follow the instructions at; http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/MacOS_X ,and using the link; http://downloads.openmoko.org/releases/Om2008.9 grabbing the rootfs o