Re: Detecting 1024 on qtmoko

2010-05-02 Thread Radek Polak
Dne So 1. května 2010 15:38:12 Peter Mogensen napsal(a): Also... do QtMoko really log to files on flash or have I missed something. I would prefer logging to a ramfs like on SHR. Now it logs to flash. I have been experimenting with this a little. It's very wanted for next releases... Regards

Re: Detecting 1024 on qtmoko

2010-05-02 Thread Stefan Monnier
Also... do QtMoko really log to files on flash or have I missed something. I would prefer logging to a ramfs like on SHR. Now it logs to flash. I have been experimenting with this a little. It's very wanted for next releases... I use the following script: % cat /etc/init.d/syslog-busybox

Re: Detecting 1024 on qtmoko

2010-05-01 Thread Peter Mogensen
Peter Mogensen wrote: So do anyone have pointers to fool-proof 1024 bug detection on QtMoko Ok... upgrade to V22 and the problem with no network seemed to be solved by a cold start. Now QtMoko runs and the phone works with deep_sleep enabled, though it is not 1024-fixed. This is probably

Detecting 1024 on qtmoko (and others)

2010-04-23 Thread Peter Mogensen
Hi, I'm about to wake up from having spend the last year being 100% dependent on a always working phone, so the FR have been on the shelf. Now, I'm trying to figure out if I should have the phone #1024 fixed. Initial tests on SHR using the deep-sleep-check.py script from the Wiki and trying

Re: Detecting 1024 on qtmoko (and others)

2010-04-23 Thread Al Johnson
On Friday 23 April 2010, Peter Mogensen wrote: Hi, I'm about to wake up from having spend the last year being 100% dependent on a always working phone, so the FR have been on the shelf. Now, I'm trying to figure out if I should have the phone #1024 fixed. Initial tests on SHR using the