Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-03-02 Thread Petr Vanek
>> >> Raster, what devices are those? Do they feature a gsm device too? > >maybe. maybe not. this is the point where you will just be guessing. :) :) OK, i understand. cheers ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://l

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-03-02 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:01:51 +0100 Petr Vanek said: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:44:01 +1100 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) (CH(R) wrote: > > >remember you are just getting e's default upstream theme - it actually > >works just fine on the more modern devices i have (omap3, 6410 etc.) > > Raster

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-03-02 Thread Petr Vanek
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:44:01 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) (CH(R) wrote: >remember you are just getting e's default upstream theme - it actually >works just fine on the more modern devices i have (omap3, 6410 etc.) Raster, what devices are those? Do they feature a gsm device too? thank

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-03-02 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:44:12 +0100 Helge Hafting said: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > i really suggest you have a better look at the code. it uses timepoints. > > Good advice. Critic based on assumptions isn't good enough. > Still, the problem remain. The user interface is a bi

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-03-02 Thread Helge Hafting
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > i really suggest you have a better look at the code. it uses timepoints. Good advice. Critic based on assumptions isn't good enough. Still, the problem remain. The user interface is a bit on the slow side. And it doesn't have to - simplified themes are f

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:16:39 +0100 Flemming Richter Mikkelsen said: > Once again I write about something I shouldn't > write about at all since I don't know how it works. > > I could be very, very wrong here... just guessing: > > I got a feeling that no calculation (no effects) > is faster than

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:13:39 -0300 robert lazarski said: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:35 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:31:43 +0100 Helge Hafting > > said: > > > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > > > >> When I try to impress people with the FR, I show them cool ap

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread robert lazarski
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:35 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:31:43 +0100 Helge Hafting said: > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > >> When I try to impress people with the FR, I show them cool apps like >> linball. Not the icon interface. It is not that hot anyway - and >

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
Once again I write about something I shouldn't write about at all since I don't know how it works. I could be very, very wrong here... just guessing: I got a feeling that no calculation (no effects) is faster than this "optimal code". OM2008.0808 and earlier was quite fast and I think adding all

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:43:00 -0500 Joel Newkirk said: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 > Helge Hafting wrote: > > > Joel Newkirk wrote: > > > > With the default.edj theme (Illume doesn't override it for Fileman, > > > which includes Illume icons) every icon on the 'desktop' initially > > >

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:31:43 +0100 Helge Hafting said: > Joel Newkirk wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 > > Helge Hafting wrote: > > > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > > > [...] > > As I said, I'm guessing, but when I removed the extra PNG images and > > leav just one, enlightenment averag

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-26 Thread Hendrik Siedelmann
2009/2/26 Helge Hafting : > Joel Newkirk wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 >> Helge Hafting wrote: >> >>> Joel Newkirk wrote: >> > [...] >> As I said, I'm guessing, but when I removed the extra PNG images and >> leav just one, enlightenment average CPU drops and the display is more >> r

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-26 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:31:43 +0100 Helge Hafting wrote: > Joel Newkirk wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 > > Helge Hafting wrote: > > > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > > > [...] > > As I said, I'm guessing, but when I removed the extra PNG images and > > leav just one, enlightenment avera

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-26 Thread William Kenworthy
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 11:31 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > Joel Newkirk wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 > > Helge Hafting wrote: > > > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > > ... > the good ones as > well. :-( > > Maybe we ought to use a modified duke nukem as an app launcher interface > i

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-26 Thread Helge Hafting
Joel Newkirk wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 > Helge Hafting wrote: > >> Joel Newkirk wrote: > [...] > As I said, I'm guessing, but when I removed the extra PNG images and > leav just one, enlightenment average CPU drops and the display is more > responsive. The glass button effect /

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-25 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:43:59 +0100 Helge Hafting wrote: > Joel Newkirk wrote: > > With the default.edj theme (Illume doesn't override it for Fileman, > > which includes Illume icons) every icon on the 'desktop' initially > > displays just the icon image, be it png, jpg, animated edj, > > whateve

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-25 Thread Helge Hafting
Joel Newkirk wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:32:09 +0100 > Helge Hafting wrote: > >> Yorick Moko wrote: I (and surely others) am working on a leaner, faster theme - any eye-candy that distinctly impacts the user experience should NOT be default, and in this case we desperately need

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-25 Thread Helge Hafting
Joel Newkirk wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:19:37 +0800 > HouYu Li wrote: > >> Sounds amazing. But where can we get the serenity.edj theme??? >> > > Nowhere right now, I'm working on it. I've gotten a few thing just > how I want them, others as yet untouched, and occasional bugs. > Started wit

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-24 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:19:37 +0800 HouYu Li wrote: > Sounds amazing. But where can we get the serenity.edj theme??? > Nowhere right now, I'm working on it. I've gotten a few thing just how I want them, others as yet untouched, and occasional bugs. Started with illume.edj, imported some pieces

Re: GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-24 Thread HouYu Li
Sounds amazing. But where can we get the serenity.edj theme??? On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Joel Newkirk wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:32:09 +0100 > Helge Hafting wrote: > > > Yorick Moko wrote: > > >> I (and surely others) am working on a leaner, faster theme - any > > >> eye-candy that

GUI responsiveness (was Re: SHR first impression : it's slow ?)

2009-02-24 Thread Joel Newkirk
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:32:09 +0100 Helge Hafting wrote: > Yorick Moko wrote: > >> I (and surely others) am working on a leaner, faster theme - any > >> eye-candy that distinctly impacts the user experience should NOT be > >> default, and in this case we desperately need a simple and fast > >> the