Em 07-06-2010 16:00, Al Johnson escreveu:
> As Joerg says, I don't think it should be worthy of a patent. Unfortunately
> courts in the US have been progressively lowering the obviousness bar to the
> point where it's patentable unless someone has explicitly described it
> already
> before the
On Monday 07 June 2010, Jose Luis Perez Diez wrote:
> A Dilluns 07 Juny 2010 12:34:31, Patryk Benderz va escriure:
> > Dnia 2010-06-05, sob o godzinie 13:08 +0100, Al Johnson pisze:
> > > It hasn't been granted yet, and the Y-cable was around before it was
> > > filed, but perhaps not by long enoug
A Dilluns 07 Juny 2010 12:34:31, Patryk Benderz va escriure:
> Dnia 2010-06-05, sob o godzinie 13:08 +0100, Al Johnson pisze:
> > It hasn't been granted yet, and the Y-cable was around before it was
> > filed, but perhaps not by long enough.
>
> [cut]
> Should we be afraid of this patent?
> Is it
Dnia 2010-06-05, sob o godzinie 13:08 +0100, Al Johnson pisze:
> It hasn't been granted yet, and the Y-cable was around before it was filed,
> but perhaps not by long enough.
[cut]
Should we be afraid of this patent?
Is it used in FR?
--
Patryk "LeadMan" Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()
It hasn't been granted yet, and the Y-cable was around before it was filed,
but perhaps not by long enough.
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-
Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220100077121%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20100077121&RS=DN/20100077121
5 matches
Mail list logo
