Hello.
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:35, Richard Franks wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 10:00 -0600, Dan Koester wrote:
> > Consider the issue closed.
>
> What, that's it, no exciting Friday flame war? Intelligent people with
> differing opinions respecting each other and reaching consensus?! Am I
> on
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 10:00 -0600, Dan Koester wrote:
> Consider the issue closed.
What, that's it, no exciting Friday flame war? Intelligent people with
differing opinions respecting each other and reaching consensus?! Am I
on the wrong Internet?
Seriously though, I am glad to be on a mailing li
Not a problem. I will not think any differently of anyone. I just
wanted to argue my point a little more.
I suppose, like him, I'm not afraid to speak my mind.
Consider the issue closed.
Dan
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> On 11/17/06 1:49 PM, "Dan Koester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I didn'
On 11/17/06 1:49 PM, "Dan Koester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't realize there were such strong feelings towards these ideas...
> I do see the reasons for the reply-to address... but the subject line
> doesn't make sense to me at all. I feel it's a huge advantage to add a
> prefix that i
Hello.
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:49, Dan Koester wrote:
> I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I've been on mailing lists for years
> and they all have followed these 2 things and I suppose I'm used to
> them.
Why not read one of the kernel devel lists?
> When I click on reply I expected it to automa
On Friday 17 November 2006 06:49, Dan Koester wrote:
> I didn't realize there were such strong feelings towards these ideas...
> I do see the reasons for the reply-to address... but the subject line
> doesn't make sense to me at all. I feel it's a huge advantage to add a
> prefix that is well know
I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I've been on mailing lists for years
and they all have followed these 2 things and I suppose I'm used to
them. When I click on reply I expected it to automatically reply-to the
list. Which in this case I have to ctrl-l to force it to reply to the
list. I've never
Hello.
This comes up again and again on ml's, so just shoirt answers.
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:11, Dan Koester wrote:
> Someone brought it to my attention that I was not replying to the entire
> list when I hit reply (I was not checking and assuming it was returning
> to the list). It appears as
Someone brought it to my attention that I was not replying to the entire
list when I hit reply (I was not checking and assuming it was returning
to the list). It appears as though the reply-to address is not set to
the lists address.
Also it would be handy (and I have e-mailed the admin account l
9 matches
Mail list logo
