Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you purchase a device from them? The GPL does not require source > code availability to just anyone who wants it - the distributor only > needs to provide it to those people to whom they distribute the binary. > > I agre

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Rod Whitby
Angus Ainslie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Didier Raboud wrote: > > Russell Hay wrote: > > > >> I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? > Certainly > >> cant see any men

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Stephen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > A quick look for references on the FSF website has not revealed the > relevant info, but this issue bit MEPIS back in 2006 and had > widespread media coverage: > > http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4218186268.html

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Stephen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Angus Ainslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Didier Raboud wrote: >> > Russell Hay wrote: >> > >> >> I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly >> >> cant see any

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Didier Raboud wrote: > > Russell Hay wrote: > > > >> I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly > >> cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. > > > > Formally, they only have to

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Rod Whitby
Didier Raboud wrote: > Russell Hay wrote: > >> I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly >> cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. > > Formally, they only have to release the source code to their buyers... ... and then that buyer can release it

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Didier Raboud
Russell Hay wrote: > I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly > cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. Formally, they only have to release the source code to their buyers... -- Swisslinux.org − Le carrefour GNU/Linux en Suisse − http://www.sw

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Russell Hay
I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. 2008/9/22 Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2008/9/22 Joseph Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven'

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Robin Paulson
2008/9/22 Joseph Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven't: > > http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08/09/21/1730256.shtml > > I'm just looking forward to being able to download the code to run on > one of my phones :) i did. the most inter

Neopwn

2008-09-21 Thread Joseph Reeves
I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven't: http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08/09/21/1730256.shtml I'm just looking forward to being able to download the code to run on one of my phones :) Joseph ___ Openmoko community m