On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jon Kristian Nilsen
wrote:
> For instance font-sizes should imho be adjustable by the app, not
> locked to a theme.
I do believe, it is also beneficial to adjust the overall look to it.
My view is pretty
much summerized in jimmac's blogpost:
http://jimmac.musichall
Ok, I feel I have to say this now:
Guys, you *cannot* take my proposal and expect it to look cute when you
re-size and fit them in a phone window, there's a reason this is a mock-up.
I think all areas in my proposal are more than readable, have you compared
to android or iphone for instance? I don
I wouldn't mind to have a separate theme with great contrast, large
buttons etc. One theme doesn't have to suite everyone...
r
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists
>
> You completely missed my point. I see many old people, when they look
> at their phone, they take an *eyeglasses* to be able to navigate or
> dial a people from the phonebook.
>
I agree, although im not *old* I do wear glasses for reading. Since I dont
need the glasses for anything but readi
>Also soon, a suspend button will appear on the launcher at the bottom
>right corner (in the current git, there is already a picture, but not
>a real button).
>The reasoning is simple, when you use your phone everyday (as I am),
>you want to suspend it *fast*. Without going to the illume icon view
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> About the information density & 4 lines text too small - Why not use
> the full 5 blocks (= 60% of the screen area) of space to show
> information when you select one of the menu items.
I like this idea.
Also soon, a suspend button will ap
About the information density & 4 lines text too small - Why not use
the full 5 blocks (= 60% of the screen area) of space to show
information when you select one of the menu items. It's not much use
to show 'Telephony, messaging, connectivity and config' texts, if
you've clicked on 'people'. The i
>In your proposal there is no place for bigger texts. It is that simple.
>It needs to rethink some part of the gui. No code will help here.
I will take a look at what could be improve on, in regards to what has been
mentioned here.
>Sorry I dont understand it. Plan for what exactly?
Well you se
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:36 PM, EdorFaus wrote:>
> This approach doesn't work. Especially the blurring is wrong.
>
> The Freerunner screen has a lot more pixels in the same physical size,
> so it is much sharper than your computer screen - resizing down like
> that loses information, and then the
> Just some remarks;)
>
> 1: Try to put these pictures on the Freerunner, to see how it feels.
> There are view
> image viewer out there, or you can even write a simple elementary
> application for it.
>
> On my 15.4" laptop, the freerunner screen is equal to a 176x235 pixel
> rectangle. So if y
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Jon Kristian Nilsen
wrote:
>>So could you please repost your proposal with much bigger texts?;)
>
> I believe your approach to this is wrong, my mockups contains elements that
> for sure needs to be taken care of in the code,
> this includes, if im not mistaken, tex
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Laszlo KREKACS
wrote:
Thanks Laszlo for your comments - Jonkristian don't let him press you
down, there's a lot of good in your layout!
But it might be a good idea to try some of this at Freerunner (neon is
a nice image viewer) to see the sizes etc.
> 3. No ide
Laszlo KREKACS wrote:
> 1: Try to put these pictures on the Freerunner, to see how it feels.
> There are view
> image viewer out there, or you can even write a simple elementary
> application for it.
Did you try this yourself? I just did.
(I used Neon (package om-neon) as image viewer, clicking t
>So could you please repost your proposal with much bigger texts?;)
I believe your approach to this is wrong, my mockups contains elements that
for sure needs to be taken care of in the code,
this includes, if im not mistaken, text styles, sizes, shapes of boxes
etc...
Have you layed out a plan f
> Just some remarks;)
Also could you post all your icons as separate .png files?
With a reasonable license. GPL is required for paroli.
(but you can dual-license, release it as public domain, etc)
Best regards,
Laszlo
___
Openmoko community mailing l
Very nice +++
-f-
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Dan Staley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Steven Le Roux wrote:
>
>> It's just Brilliant !!
>> I would love to use that ! But maybe it should be a different project than
>> paroli because I think it more than a theme which is needed to
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Jon Kristian Nilsen
wrote:
> Now these are just mock-ups, but ihmo pretty god ones. I've spent quality
> time thinking about user friendliness and what I'd like to see:) Ofcourse
> I've probably missed
Just some remarks;)
1: Try to put these pictures on the Free
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Dan Staley wrote:
> Those ideas look great! But I agree with Steven, I think it would require
> much more than a theme to get that functionality working.
I dont think so.
Best regards,
Laszlo
___
Openmoko community ma
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> It's just Brilliant !!
> I would love to use that ! But maybe it should be a different project than
> paroli because I think it more than a theme which is needed to approach your
> mockups
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Jon Kristian
It's just Brilliant !!
I would love to use that ! But maybe it should be a different project than
paroli because I think it more than a theme which is needed to approach your
mockups
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
> Long overdue, but here it comes:)
>
> As mentioned
Long overdue, but here it comes:)
As mentioned a couple of times on irc, I've been working on a few ideas I've
had regarding paroli.
What got me interested in this was the post to the ML some time ago:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-May/048133.html
Now these are just mock-ups,
21 matches
Mail list logo
