Hey!
I personally really like this idea and I'd be glad to test your plugin :) It'd
fit fine into my NetBeans. Finally it'll get a use besides being abused for
php-scripting...
Testing on Kubuntu Hardy 8.04 & Mac OS X 10.5.2 if you want.
Greetings,
Fabian Off
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von:
What's wrong with Eclipse? It's much more common for embedded IDE's
isn't it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lally Singh
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:08 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: OM IDE (was: Re: Common L
Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier
& dumber about a lot of things. You end up spending a lot more time
fiddling with it to work right than NB.
The tradeoff w/NB is that it tends to do the right thing, but is
slower. Definitely so on my mac, but the speed differ
Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented and is looking super-nifty by
now) :)
Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
> Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
> have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
> mapping.
>
> But, now that we're
You're welcome to do so :-)
I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't
have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to
you. So when it's "finished" I will insta
2008 1:19 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier
& dumber about a lot of things. You end up spending a lot more time
fiddling with it to work
: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:19 PM
> To: List for Openmoko community discussion
>
>
> Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
>
>
> Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier
> & dumber about a lot of things. You e
Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
> You're welcome to do so :-)
>
> I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
> respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
> Studio.
Note, please, that i said KDevelop 4, not KDevelop ;) There's a huge
differe
PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
You're welcome to do so :-)
I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.
I use vim, and it is the best IDE I have ever used:)
(My point is that it is impossible to get people to agree
on one IDE, since we all have different taste and needs)
--
Please don't send me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Join the FSF
Bastian Muck ha scritto:
Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't
have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to
you. So when it's "finished" I will install Netbeans, too.
Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know how fast your computer is, but i never had performance
issues. Even in a VMWare-Image my Eclipse worked very fine (and I don't
think I'm a slow hacker). The only thing, which can be slow is the
code-completion. But this can be deaktiva
Lally Singh ha scritto:
Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM.
I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that
a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the
emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you uploa
Hi,
I want to use it with Ubuntu ;)
I'm new to the OM community, so I'm wondering if you are the first one
who want to build such thing. Isn't there any existing IDE integration
for the OM?
Lally Singh schrieb:
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
have a basic
Hi,
--- On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Lally Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I was thinking about putting together a Netbeans plugin to dev for it.
| I'm wondering:
| 1. anyone want to use such a thing?
| 2. anyone wanna help?
\--
Try this?
https://projects.openmoko.org/projects/preity-plugi
Excellent! Perhaps I'll be able to reuse/extend the work here for a
common backend, and then just write a Netbeans frontend to use it.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> --- On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Lally Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Bastian
> Muck ha scritto:
>> Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I
>> don't have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.
>> But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to writ
Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM.
I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that
a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the
emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you upload it to
your OM device, an
19 matches
Mail list logo
