Al Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008, Andy Selby wrote:
>
>>> If we want to install additional packages is would FSO also be an option?
>>>
>> Not as far as I know, they're trying to get the basics working, last i
>> checked it could suspend/resume and make/receive calls, nothing
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Andy Selby wrote:
> >If we want to install additional packages is would FSO also be an option?
>
> Not as far as I know, they're trying to get the basics working, last i
> checked it could suspend/resume and make/receive calls, nothing more
opkg works - I installed gpe-sc
>> Try here
>> http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200807/20080703/
> Is this not qtopia?
> or is ASU hidden behind this:
Sorry, I just realised I posted the exact same url as you did.
ASU does include qtopia apps, but it also has the shelf widgets (the
popdown menu at the top of the sc
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Andy Selby wrote:
> > I get the impression that only qtopia has daily builds, is that correct?
>
> No, ASU has it too
>
> > If wee want to use ASU the most recent is the one from 2.) i.e. May 20?
>
> Try here
> http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200807/20080703
> I get the impression that only qtopia has daily builds, is that correct?
No, ASU has it too
> If wee want to use ASU the most recent is the one from 2.) i.e. May 20?
Try here
http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200807/20080703/
___
Openmo
Thanks so much for the input!
One thing is clear: there are a lot of things happening.
In the meantime, I have tried the qtopia snapshots from
1.) http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200807/20080703/
this seems to be qtopia only
2.) http://downloads.openmoko.org/releases/Freerunne
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 12:16 +0200, Jay Vaughan wrote:
> The point is - what can we *developers* target for our end users?
> Without some stability on this image issue, 3rd-party developers are
> gonna get screwed. There may well be a market for new apps on
> OpenMoko; but not if there is no
> The point is - what can we *developers* target for our end users?
fso, as i understand it. it offers a framework separating gui from
internals and is supposed to be gui toolkit agnostic, thus allowing to
coexist qt, gtk, e?? and whatever toolkits for guis will become available.
> Without
> The base software is just that. Base software. It will function as an
> everyday phone with dialer,
> SMS, and contacts. So, you can take that base and build on it, by
> yourself
> or with others. Or, come
> August timeframe you can get the Beta release of ASU.
> FSO is a framework or middlewar
Hi Folks,
I have tried a lot of images, and been frequently disappointed by
finding many Applications running on top of basic functionality
with obvious and longstanding bugs.
The latest image, the one called fso, is really exciting as it is simple
to start with, beautiful to look at and seems to
The base software is just that. Base software. It will function as an
everyday phone with dialer,
SMS, and contacts. So, you can take that base and build on it, by yourself
or with others. Or, come
August timeframe you can get the Beta release of ASU.
FSO is a framework or middleware if you like.
http://dos.jogger.pl/2008/06/29/asu-to-przyszlosc/
> 2008/7/1 Mo Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Are there any screenshots anywhere of the current state of FSO?
>> I am interested because this thread is the first I have heard of it.
___
Openmoko com
2008/7/1 Mo Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are there any screenshots anywhere of the current state of FSO?
> I am interested because this thread is the first I have heard of it.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=toPe0S8QpJY
___
Openmoko community mailing
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Mo Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are there any screenshots anywhere of the current state of FSO?
> I am interested because this thread is the first I have heard of it.
>
> I haven't been able to find any, but keep an eye on
http://planet.openmoko.org/ . Tha
Are there any screenshots anywhere of the current state of FSO?
I am interested because this thread is the first I have heard of it.
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:40 -0400, Charles Pax wrote:
> Here is a good comparison of the images
> http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2008/06/28/gtk-asu-fso-t
> This is my responsibility and I'm well aware that it's needed, and has
> been needed, for a very long time. Unfortunately time has not
> permitted
> me to attend to this yet.
Well to help you out, I'll just keep talking about it for a while, but
only every now and then, and at least only un
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> What would be the best image to use currently. Is the FSO an option?
>> Any advice?
>
>
>
> In my opinion, try them all and find one you like.
>
> There really needs to be a *much* better degree of pimp'atude coming
> from OpenMoko on the images to run
This is my res
Here is a good comparison of the images
http://www.vanille-media.de/site/index.php/2008/06/28/gtk-asu-fso-tmtla/
-Charles
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What would be the best image to use currently. Is the FSO an option?
> > Any advice?
>
>
>
> In my
> What would be the best image to use currently. Is the FSO an option?
> Any advice?
In my opinion, try them all and find one you like.
There really needs to be a *much* better degree of pimp'atude coming
from OpenMoko on the images to run .. like, an official page,
available in a non-obscu
On Monday 30 June 2008, Eildert Groeneveld wrote:
> Hello Folks
>
> so here it is the nice black box. It does boot and it could even connect to
> the Vodaphone network and got the LL phone ringing. great!
> But what now? The applications look rather skinny.
>
> What would be the best image to use c
20 matches
Mail list logo