On Wednesday 13 July 2011, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for your answer...
>
> On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White wrote:
> > acceleration pathways. A lot of the performance difficulties with the
> > X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server
> > can't possibl
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your answer...
On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White wrote:
> acceleration pathways. A lot of the performance difficulties with the
> X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server
> can't possibly know enough about what the client wants to accelerate it
>
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:05:02 +0100
Neil Jerram wrote:
> Just wondering... is it at all feasible, in the nearish future, for
> Wayland to run on the Freerunner? I mean directly on KMS, not as an X
> client.
>
> Would there be any advantage to that, compared to the current X usage?
> I'm imaginin
3 matches
Mail list logo
