[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance:
Proposed wiki page:
How to respond to list email:
1. Never remove any "re: " in the message subject. Some (not all) email
clients use this to identify the thread.
2. If your email client adds the original poster and other
addressees to the
Reid,
Your test doesnt work when you are looking at messages that you
yourself sent. Messages you send from a given thread are always in the
same thread, but messages from someone else from the same thread with
a different subject are not put in the same thread, and that is the
problem on the lis
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:00 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> On 2/13/07, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> > > hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> > > better way". With your way, even if you chang
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Richard Bennett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 15:28, hank williams wrote:
Again, out of 15 lists, this only happens for me on the openmoko list.
Now I have read that some consider this a feature. And perhaps there
are benefits I don't understand. but with 25-50% of
On 2/13/07, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> better way". With your way, even if you change the subject it would be
> part of the same thread.
I believe that
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> better way". With your way, even if you change the subject it would be
> part of the same thread.
I believe that is proper --> to remain part of the same thread. To
c
Thanks Richard.
I have read this before, but forgot the official name of reply-to munging.
I think your analysis is correct. The only thing I would say is that
the "non-standards compliant" way of handling list administration is
in fact, as far as I can tell, the standard way that at least the m
On 2/13/07, Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salve hank!
This explains the CC'ing.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
> and think I understand the problem.
>
> The problem is with the list.
>
> I am on 15 te
On 2/13/07, Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salve hank!
Thank you for your feedback ;)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
> properly.
Maybe, it would be nice when other gmail users
explain gmail users how t
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 15:28, hank williams wrote:
> Again, out of 15 lists, this only happens for me on the openmoko list.
> Now I have read that some consider this a feature. And perhaps there
> are benefits I don't understand. but with 25-50% of the tech mailing
> list readers using gmail,
Salve hank!
This explains the CC'ing.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
> and think I understand the problem.
>
> The problem is with the list.
>
> I am on 15 tech mailing lists, and this is the only one which, if
Salve hank!
Thank you for your feedback ;)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
> properly.
Maybe, it would be nice when other gmail users
explain gmail users how to use gmail proper,
instead of that I have to inform
I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
and think I understand the problem.
The problem is with the list.
I am on 15 tech mailing lists, and this is the only one which, if I in
gmail say "reply to" replys to the sender and not to the list.
I NEVER*** want to re
Robert,
You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
properly. In fact I think it is the best product on the market, free
or otherwise, for handling threads. The problem which you are
referring to has nothing to do with gmail, but with the fact that some
people mistakenl
Salve!
Excuse me, I myself was writing once here on this list
about respect and to give everybody a warm welcome.
The best solution for mailinglist formal things would
be personal mails with explaination...
Robert Michel schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. Februar 2007 um 13:57h:
> The gmailers here on
15 matches
Mail list logo
