On Wednesday 21 May 2008 12:04:40 Samuel Melrose wrote:
> Sorry to stick my nose in on this, especially if I'm missing something.
> But do you guys have anything decided about this, and what it is all
> going to be stored on? May I suggest using SQLite for the data
> storage? It is very lightweight
Hey,
Sorry to stick my nose in on this, especially if I'm missing something.
But do you guys have anything decided about this, and what it is all
going to be stored on? May I suggest using SQLite for the data
storage? It is very lightweight, not much ram or processor use needed,
unlike parsi
Am Fr 16. Mai 2008 schrieb ian douglas:
> MartinG wrote:
> > On Friday 16 May 2008 03:26:06 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >> yeah. this is actually the bigger problem we face in the longer run.
> >> standardising data stores and access to them etc. :)
> >
> > I think this is a important point that sh
MartinG wrote:
On Friday 16 May 2008 03:26:06 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
yeah. this is actually the bigger problem we face in the longer run.
standardising data stores and access to them etc. :)
I think this is a important point that should be given some thought
before everyone starts hacking. Wo
On Friday 16 May 2008 03:26:06 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 01:44:59 +0200 "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > ... choose the toolkit you like. i really do not like the whole
> > > mindset of "we must program i
5 matches
Mail list logo
