Reiser's case is more complicated than that. Anyway let's not bring it.
05/25/15 03:03 -ին Bob Hamը գրել է.
> On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 01:54 -0700, Brolin Empey wrote:
>> Bob Ham wrote:
>
>>> I don't know any other free software developers who
>>> threaten to murder those who get in the way of their
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 01:54 -0700, Brolin Empey wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
> > I don't know any other free software developers who
> > threaten to murder those who get in the way of their work.
>
> Hans Reiser? ;-)
Hans Reiser murdered his wife who had left him, not someone who got in
the way of hi
Bob Ham wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 17:11 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
>> It is also a well-known fact that most free software developers derive
>> great personal satisfaction from doing something that benefits a
>> larger community
>
> True. However, there's a very big difference betw
>> but still very different from the the goals of Free Software.
> Are they very different?
As long as this FreeCalypso code stays very obscure and marginal, in
practice the difference might not matter that much.
I think what you're saying is that from an Open Source point of view,
his effort is j
>FWIW, last I checked, his work does sadly not enjoy any of those
>freedoms. Yes, you *can* look at the code, change it, and redistribute
>it, but you're not legally allowed to because the source code he has
>is proprietary.
>
le sigh
Imagine you are broke and starving hungry (that's quite easy
> Lets not forget - just one man working doggedly on the only project that
> offers any possibility of a cell phone running firmware that offers the
> four freedoms.
FWIW, last I checked, his work does sadly not enjoy any of those
freedoms. Yes, you *can* look at the code, change it, and redistri
>
>I guess I was misled by OsmocomBB's website; it certainly seems to be saying
>that that is exactly what it is--on the front page of >http://bb.osmocom.org/>:
>
> In short: By using OsmocomBB on a compatible phone,
> you will be able to make and receive phone calls,
> se
As this thread/threat has not much to do with Openmoko, could you please
move this away from this list, talk off-list about or create somewhere
another mailing list for this idea.
Thanks in advance
matthias (long term user on GTA-02)
--
Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixa
Bob Ham wrote:
> As I said, perhaps I can help you to achieve some peace.
Your "help" in that department is unwelcome and unwanted. I kindly
ask that you please stop your unwelcome intrusion into my personal
life.
> However, an
> absence of your writings on this list would benefit me and the w
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 15:42 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
>
> > I disagree. The same pathological need still seems very much present.
> > And the emphasis here is on the "pathological". In your emails to this
> > list, there is still a very strong strain of psychological
Bob Ham wrote:
> I disagree. The same pathological need still seems very much present.
> And the emphasis here is on the "pathological". In your emails to this
> list, there is still a very strong strain of psychological
> disequilibrium and this is a bad thing, for the list, the wider
> commun
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 21:28 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
>
> > > Because I use one to stay in touch with the people who matter in my
> > > life
> >
> > What would be the consequences if you didn't have a mobile phone to do
> > that?
>
> I consider this status quo to be a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> GSM
What is it about GSM that would make you move across the world just to use it?
Do your family and friends feel the same way about GSM?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/User:PaulWise
___
Paul Wise wrote:
> In 2017, AT&T will be shutting down their GSM network in the USA in
> favour of 3G/4G.
If AT&T likes losing customers, it's their choice. I use T-Mobile
(satisfied customer since 2003 with just one short break before I
entered the libre phone scene in 2011), and I saw somewhe
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> I do have a mobile phone for communicating with my family and friends
In 2017, AT&T will be shutting down their GSM network in the USA in
favour of 3G/4G. Macau is planning to shut down their GSM services in
June 2015. I would hazar
Bob Ham wrote:
> > Because I use one to stay in touch with the people who matter in my
> > life
>
> What would be the consequences if you didn't have a mobile phone to do
> that?
I do have a mobile phone for communicating with my family and friends
etc, and have had one continuously since 2003.
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 17:11 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
>
> > Why is your wellness dependant on a phone?
>
> Because I use one to stay in touch with the people who matter in my
> life
What would be the consequences if you didn't have a mobile phone to do
that?
> It i
Bob Ham wrote:
> Why is your wellness dependant on a phone?
Because I use one to stay in touch with the people who matter in my
life, and I need this essential communication device to be free from
closed black-box firmware.
It is also a well-known fact that most free software developers derive
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 15:38 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> > I wish you healing and wellness.
>
> Those will happen automatically as soon as I have a phone in my purse
> that runs my own firmware.
Why is your wellness dependant on a phone?
__
>> Lets not forget - just one man working doggedly on the only project that
>> offers any possibility of a cell phone running firmware that offers the four
>> freedoms.
>
>OsmocomBB?
>
No
A fine project I have no doubt, but it's not aimed at producing firmware for an
end-user phone.
I believe
Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> OsmocomBB?
Unfortunately they seem to have absolutely no interest in producing a
phone (or firmware for a phone) which an end user could carry in her
purse. Their software absolutely requires the phone to be tethered to
a PC at all times (instead of running the GSM
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 21:32 +, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> I am not
> asking you to publicly apologize for the 2 years of mental TORTURE you
> put me through
They didn't put you through torture, you put yourself through it. You
continue to do that now, in different ways.
The person who y
On 04/18/2015 08:30 AM, m...@dmatthews.org wrote:
>> I'm impressed by‎ your dedication and detail, and I partly enjoy reading
>> your updates
>
> +1 but s/partly/entirely [although I also didn't enjoy reading threats :-)]
>
> Lets not forget - just one man working doggedly on the only project
On Sat 18 April 2015 21:32:21 Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> I am not
> asking you to publicly apologize for the 2 years of mental TORTURE you
> put me through - so why are people asking me to apologize for my
> reaction to that torture?
Listen buddy!
NOBODY TORTURED YOU, except you yourself did
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Thanks for brining it up, Neil. Alas, you see, it's in vain. Despite al=
> l the=20
> good will from our side. [...]
I don't hold any grudges against you. I don't consider you an enemy.
I don't have any ill will toward you or any of your former coworkers
who badly hur
On Sat 18 April 2015 09:41:03 n...@ossau.homelinux.net wrote:
> I wonder if you might now consider retracting and apologising for those, and
> undertake not to repeat similar in future?
Thanks for brining it up, Neil. Alas, you see, it's in vain. Despite all the
good will from our side. This guy
On Sat 18 April 2015 20:22:31 m...@dmatthews.org wrote:
> yeah crazy - the four freedoms on a cell phone - only a nut case would dream
> that one up
you're completely missing the point.
this guy threatening OM and me personally to kill me when I don't grant him
access to sources which even OM had
>
>futile effort to educate persons with such mental issues.
>s/educate/cure/
yeah crazy - the four freedoms on a cell phone - only a nut case would dream
that one up
--
David Matthews
m...@dmatthews.org
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@l
On Sat 18 April 2015 17:41:02 Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
> I would never had been able to work on a project like FreeCalypso -
> neither technically nor emotionally - while there were persons in the
> so-called "community" taunting me with "we have this source which
> would make a night-and-day
n...@ossau.homelinux.net wrote:
> but I find it hard to forget the unacceptably violent threats that you've
> made in the past (on this list) towards particular people.
The people you are referring to tormented me in the most heinous
manner for a full 2 years (from the fall of 2011 till about the
>I'm impressed byâ your dedication and detail, and I partly enjoy reading
>your updates
+1 but s/partly/entirely [although I also didn't enjoy reading threats :-)]
Lets not forget - just one man working doggedly on the only project that offers
any possibility of a cell phone running firmware
community@lists.openmoko.org
Reply To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: State of FreeCalypso
Hello community,
This periodic post is a summary of the goals of the FreeCalypso family
of projects and the high-level status toward their achievement.
Goals
=
The overall end goals of the project
Hello community,
This periodic post is a summary of the goals of the FreeCalypso family
of projects and the high-level status toward their achievement.
Goals
=
The overall end goals of the project are, in no particular order:
1. Produce a standalone realization of Openmoko's modem. I have
33 matches
Mail list logo