Bastiaan Hovestreydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, but I couldn't stop Apache from trying to execute the script
> other than renaming it, so its now here [1].
>
>
> Bastiaan
>
> [1] http://openmoko.hovestreydt.com/download/leds
Hey Bastiaan,
you can put the script in a .tar.bz2 or .tar.gz or simply
on and off for testing purposes. There's also has a slider to set the
> > intensity of the vibrator. But since I don't anything about Python I
> > only altered the mokoservices.py to fulfill my needs and tested it only
> > under FDOM, so please be gentle :-) The script is avail
n't find
> anything in the wiki...
> I wrote a small Python script to quickly turn the LEDs of the Freerunner
> on and off for testing purposes. There's also has a slider to set the
> intensity of the vibrator. But since I don't anything about Python I
> only altered t
Hi,
I don't know if somebody else did this already, but I didn't find
anything in the wiki...
I wrote a small Python script to quickly turn the LEDs of the Freerunner
on and off for testing purposes. There's also has a slider to set the
intensity of the vibrator. But since I don
or vibration modulation, so you can use pulses with low intensity and
> > avoid waste of battery power.
>
> Nice! But why do identifier names mention GTA01?
>
>From vibrator point of view GTA01 vs GTA02 are the same, I guess.
___
OpenMoko
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:20:28 +0200, Javi Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Great, I submitted patches
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-kernel/2007-September/000249.html
for vibration modulation, so you can use pulses with low intensity and
avoid waste of battery power.
Nice! But w
On 10/3/07, Mark Arvidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a patch for neod that optionally buzzes the vibrator with each
> keystroke (the same way the sound works). I haven't submitted it
> because I'm trying to get the build to work top-to-bottom.
>
> Let me kn
I have a patch for neod that optionally buzzes the vibrator with each
keystroke (the same way the sound works). I haven't submitted it
because I'm trying to get the build to work top-to-bottom.
Let me know if you would like to test it.
--sagacis
On 10/1/07, Jeffrey Thomas <[EM
On 10/1/07, Kamisamanou Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll agree with that. I actually like the vibration idea. I don't like
> that the list is loaded with stuff like
> "IR portRemote control applications Would be great to use openmoko as a
> Hamony remote controller."
> I don't quite see
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
SIEMENS had shown such a display speaker at CeBIT 2002.
Here a German blog entry with some photos and descriptions:
http://www.usp-forum.de/prototypen-classics-limited-editions/15744-display-speaker-phone.html
Yes, but a touch screen is more sinsible than thos
On 02/10/2007, Sven Klomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i'm not sure that's a good idea: is the screen designed to take such
> > repeated vibrations, they're usually pretty sensitive?
> Do you think this applies also for the build-in vibrator (give me another
&
w-frequency sound
you can feel it with your fingers. And it's much lower-power than
using the vibrator. But I'm not sure how you attach a piezo to the
screen; maybe the idea is to just vibrate the touchscreen film so as
to have lower mass.
i'm not sure that's a good idea: is t
ace
> > as the audio transducer, that way if you play a low-frequency sound
> > you can feel it with your fingers. And it's much lower-power than
> > using the vibrator. But I'm not sure how you attach a piezo to the
> > screen; maybe the idea is to just vibrate the touc
On 10/1/07, Uncle Kridley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kamisamanou Burgess wrote:
> > I don't like that the list is loaded with stuff like
> > "IR portRemote control applications Would be great to use openmoko as a
> > Hamony remote controller."
> > I don't quite see the necessity in running you
Kamisamanou Burgess wrote:
> I don't like that the list is loaded with stuff like
> "IR portRemote control applications Would be great to use openmoko as a
> Hamony remote controller."
> I don't quite see the necessity in running you tv with your cellphone
I don't have much use for a fancy TV remo
I'll agree with that. I actually like the vibration idea. I don't like that
the list is loaded with stuff like
"IR portRemote control applications Would be great to use openmoko as a
Hamony remote controller."
I don't quite see the necessity in running you tv with your cellphone
On 10/1/07, Jeffre
On 02/10/2007, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea from the Jackito sounded good to me - use the screen surface
> as the audio transducer, that way if you play a low-frequency sound
> you can feel it with your fingers. And it's much lower-power than
> using
The idea from the Jackito sounded good to me - use the screen surface
as the audio transducer, that way if you play a low-frequency sound
you can feel it with your fingers. And it's much lower-power than
using the vibrator. But I'm not sure how you attach a piezo to the
screen; maybe t
> It seems that most the things on this wish list are entirely unnecessary
> and battery consuming
I am not sure what else is on the list, but I think this (vibration feedback)
is a pretty useful feature, especially for non-geeks. Remember, a lot of
think a GUI on a computer isn't needed, but ho
It seems that most the things on this wish list are entirely unnecessary and
battery consuming
On 10/1/07, Sven Klomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know, how power consuming the build-in vibrator of the neo is?
> Today, I held the Motorola Razr 2 (V8) in
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone know, how power consuming the build-in vibrator of the neo
> > is?
> > Today, I held the Motorola Razr 2 (V8) in my hands and I'm very
> > impressed of
> > the feeling of tactile feedbac
funny spam
On Monday 01 October 2007 04:41:38 pm Tim Shannon wrote:
> I don't know about that rest of you guys, but with this email title, I
> assumed this was spam.
>
> On 10/1/07, Sven Klomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone know,
I don't know about that rest of you guys, but with this email title, I
assumed this was spam.
On 10/1/07, Sven Klomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know, how power consuming the build-in vibrator of the neo is?
> Today, I held the Motorola Razr 2 (V8
Hi,
does anyone know, how power consuming the build-in vibrator of the neo is?
Today, I held the Motorola Razr 2 (V8) in my hands and I'm very impressed of
the feeling of tactile feedback of the screen buttons.
I found this approach already on the wishlist
(http://wiki.openmoko.org
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
That's a nice idea. I wonder a) whether the softest movement we can do
with the vibrator that would still not be interfering with operating
the device and b) how much power such an option would suck.
Was wondering this (b) myself, but doesn'
Ole Tange wrote:
> The Neo only has a touch screen which makes it hard to feel if a key
> is pressed. A click sound can help, but sound can be annoying to your
> environment. Visual feedback helps, but it would be nice to feel it
> too.
> You could have the phone move slightly if
>If you knowingly infringed the patent damages will rise (I seem to
>remember with a factor of 2).
Wilful patent infringement is _treble_ damages under US law.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/ma
ironment. Visual feedback helps, but it would be nice to feel it
> too.
>
> You could have the phone move slightly if the vibrator is activated
> for a very short time (e.g. 50 ms). This would give a silent, yet
> destinctive feedback.
Very cool idea!...but I think I remember hea
it
> too.
>
> You could have the phone move slightly if the vibrator is activated
> for a very short time (e.g. 50 ms). This would give a silent, yet
> destinctive feedback.
Very cool idea!...but I think I remember hearing from somebody that this is
The Neo only has a touch screen which makes it hard to feel if a key
is pressed. A click sound can help, but sound can be annoying to your
environment. Visual feedback helps, but it would be nice to feel it
too.
You could have the phone move slightly if the vibrator is activated
for a very short
ter to fetch the train
- time (1/4 1/2 3/4 1/1 hour signal)
- reached a tagged location
- a communication partner becomes reachable
I thought I already had mentioned an old idea of mine
(http://ole.tange.dk/projekter/kontroversielt/patent-ideer.html
2004-11-26): Vibrator ring tones, but I could no
Salve Ole!
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Ole Tange wrote:
> When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
> most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the frequency of
> the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the phone
> can determine wi
If it's anything like this:
http://www.mpja.com/category/DC__Motors/6mm_CELL_PHONE_VIBRATOR_MOTOR_16053_MD.asp
then it could be possible to monitor any current generated from the DC
motor as a result of the phone being moved (along certain axis').
Richard
___
10:31 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
Ole Tange wrote:
When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the frequency of
the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the phone
can determine with frequency is most noisy
On 16-Dec-06, at 10:31 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
Ole Tange wrote:
When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the
frequency of
the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the
phone
can determine
Ole Tange wrote:
> When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
> most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the frequency of
> the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the phone
> can determine with frequency is most noisy for
The intention of a vibrator is to silently alert you when the phone is
in your pocket. I think the sound of vibration on a table is an awful
horrible sound, and often results in the phone vibrating itself off
the table too.
On 12/15/06, Ole Tange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When the ph
On Friday 15 December 2006 17:00, Ole Tange wrote:
> When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
> most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the frequency of
> the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the phone
> can determine wi
When the phone is lying on a table it may be interesting to get the
most noise from the vibrator as possible. By changing the frequency of
the vibrator and analysing the sound level on the microphone the phone
can determine with frequency is most noisy for vibrating on this
surface.
/Ole
39 matches
Mail list logo