Re: at command

2009-07-13 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Test wrote: >   > I am playing w/ some AT commands. If you know what are these AT commands for? > let me know, and also how to use them? AT+CLVL is documented in the 3GPP 07.07 and 27.007 specs which you can find here: http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/ht

Re: at command

2009-07-07 Thread Mike Montour
Test wrote: > > I am playing w/ some AT commands. If you know what are these AT commands > for? let me know, and also how to use them? AT+CLVL sets the audio output volume from the Calypso (see for example http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/2121). I don't know about the others but one of th

Re: at command

2009-07-07 Thread Reid Thompson
Test wrote: > > I am playing w/ some AT commands. If you know what are these AT commands > for? let me know, and also how to use them? > > at+frq > at+clvl > at+fpw > > thanks > > > > > > ___

at command

2009-07-07 Thread Test
  I am playing w/ some AT commands. If you know what are these AT commands for? let me know, and also how to use them?   at+frq at+clvl at+fpw   thanks ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mai

Re: GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-17 Thread Ken Restivo
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:09:19AM +0200, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:33:46 +0200, Ken Restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The command appears to be "CLIR", and, unfortunately, there's no global > > setting for it. #31#PhoneNumber, means I have to type it before each

Re: GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-17 Thread AVee
On Thursday 17 July 2008 11:09, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:33:46 +0200, Ken Restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The command appears to be "CLIR", and, unfortunately, there's no global > > setting for it. #31#PhoneNumber, means I have to type it before each > > call. On la

Re: GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-17 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:33:46 +0200, Ken Restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The command appears to be "CLIR", and, unfortunately, there's no global > setting for it. #31#PhoneNumber, means I have to type it before each > call. On land phones, there's a *70 (or is it *71), to disable caller ID

Re: GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-17 Thread Ken Restivo
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:12:51AM +0200, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:50:48 +0200, Ken Restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My old, cheap 7-11 AT&T pay-as-you-go Nokia phone had a neat feature > > which would disable the Caller ID. > > > > Are there any AT commands I c

Re: GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-17 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:50:48 +0200, Ken Restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My old, cheap 7-11 AT&T pay-as-you-go Nokia phone had a neat feature > which would disable the Caller ID. > > Are there any AT commands I can issue on the FR to do the same feature? > I'm guessing it was a feature of

GSM AT command to disable/change caller ID?

2008-07-16 Thread Ken Restivo
My old, cheap 7-11 AT&T pay-as-you-go Nokia phone had a neat feature which would disable the Caller ID. Are there any AT commands I can issue on the FR to do the same feature? I'm guessing it was a feature of the GSM modem, or maybe it was an instruction to the carrier network, issued via the m

Re: AT command test suite

2007-08-12 Thread Arthur Marsh
Shakthi Kannan wrote, on 2007-07-28 21:22: Hi, I have been looking for an AT command test suite that can be run on the host. I've tried: 1. Minicom: Keying in AT commands has to be done manually. I tried using the built-in runscript feature to automate the process, for example: sen

Re: AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Mark Eichin
"Shakthi Kannan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On 7/28/07, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All very laudable goals, but that's not the question I asked. > > Because we can enhance the existing Perl code, which is old, dated at > 2001, and we want everyone to share the code and be

Re: AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 7/28/07, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All very laudable goals, but that's not the question I asked. Because we can enhance the existing Perl code, which is old, dated at 2001, and we want everyone to share the code and benefit from it. -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan

Re: AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:11, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/28/07, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why do you feel the need to apply the GPL to this? It's in the public > > domain - leave it there. > > It is implemented in Perl and command-line. > > I thought it will be valuable

Re: AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 7/28/07, Andy Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do you feel the need to apply the GPL to this? It's in the public domain - > leave it there. It is implemented in Perl and command-line. I thought it will be valuable to write a perl-GTK GUI [1] application for it, so an end-user can s

Re: AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Andy Powell
On Saturday 28 July 2007 12:52, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > > It works. But, it is under public domain. Do you think it will be good > to tweak it (and put it under GPL) so it can be used to test Neo on Why do you feel the need to apply the GPL to this? It's in the public domain - leave it there.

AT command test suite

2007-07-28 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, I have been looking for an AT command test suite that can be run on the host. I've tried: 1. Minicom: Keying in AT commands has to be done manually. I tried using the built-in runscript feature to automate the process, for example: send "AT" send "AT+CGMM&quo