Hi Michael
Well I for one would like a smartphone with completely open software - if an
open implementation of baseband code also led to an improvement in user
experience on the freerunner, that would be a bonus. Like you, I'm not too
concerned about rules imposed on us by large corporations, i
Radek Polak wrote:
> i am rather saying:
> (shortage of existing GTA02 units) -> (GTA04 is the solution)
It is *a* solution for some classes of users. It is not *the*
solution for all use cases.
> Also pool graphics performace of GTA02 make the user experience very bad -
> hardly acceptable f
On Friday 02 of December 2011 17:53:15 msoko...@ivan.harhan.org wrote:
> So I still disagree with your reasoning chain of
>
> (shortage of existing GTA02 units) -> (GTA04 is the only solution)
i am rather saying:
(shortage of existing GTA02 units) -> (GTA04 is the solution)
Also pool graphics
Radek Polak wrote:
> With my wooden case i had fully working phone - only single part
> that was from GTA02 was the speaker + microphone. I really dont
> think this is big problem.
Yes, and if I wanted to do the same thing (use a self-made wooden
case), I could have done it just as well with my
On Friday 02 December 2011 05:26:16 msoko...@ivan.harhan.org wrote:
> But seriously, swapping PCBAs between GTA02 and GTA04 is a zero-sum
> game. The number of existing {case + LCM + GSM antenna + other bits}
> sets is finite, and it stays the same whether you leave the original
> GTA02 PCBAs in
t; fw src/object
code so zealously? Why are you so unwilling to brighten up at least
one person's life by having some anonymous account upload a copy from
some public WiFi hotspot?
> Did you realize that very soon you will loose the freedom to buy GTA02?
Well, I've already got mine.
SM/UMTS modem in the GTA04 just as closed as any
> other? How is then GTA04 an improvement over GTA02 in terms of
> openness/freedom? If anything, it's a step backward from the GTA02 in
> terms of openness/freedom: at least for the GTA02's Calypso the free
> world already has fr
in terms of
openness/freedom? If anything, it's a step backward from the GTA02 in
terms of openness/freedom: at least for the GTA02's Calypso the free
world already has free physical access (legalities aside, please) to
full hw documentation for all guts of that chipset and to the fw
s
Hi Steve,
That's great news. It sounds like you're not giving up on something
you love, so good for you!
I guess we'll find out once you make more announcements and get your
website up, but I'm curious how this impacts the need for the
community to create an organization. It sounds like a commu
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> Indeed, we're interested to see where this will take us.
>
> Please try to do it better this time with the community!
> I wish you all the best luck.
Its so nice to know that OM will get more strong backing because the
community has matu
Indeed, we're interested to see where this will take us.
Please try to do it better this time with the community!
I wish you all the best luck.
r
--
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi
___
Openmoko community mailing
Wow !!!
I'm very curious to listen more.
I wish you a bright future for you and your new company.
Giovanni
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Steve Mosher wrote:
> Community,
> As many of you know may 25th was my last official day at Openmoko.
> Since that time I have been focused on two
>
Community,
As many of you know may 25th was my last official day at Openmoko.
Since that time I have been focused on two
things: First, putting my Openmoko business in order. There were several
tasks that got cut off midstream by the layoff
and I felt I owed it to the community to see those jo
las 17:49 +0300, doron escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I not sure , but,
>
> AFAIK , I can run free software for any purpose (freedom 0) , but the
> Google phone is locked to one cellular provider , T-mobile , and the
> device is SIM-locked [1] (paragraph 9 - first line).
> This is
Hi,
I not sure , but,
AFAIK , I can run free software for any purpose (freedom 0) , but the
Google phone is locked to one cellular provider , T-mobile , and the
device is SIM-locked [1] (paragraph 9 - first line).
This is not freedom !
[1]
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080923-t
On Saturday, September 20, 2008 17:55:09 yochaigal wrote:
> Usable as a day phone??? I think the Fat and Dirty distro is completely
> usable as a day phone... I should know (I use it every day with minimal
> changes... any issues I have I just reflash).
>
Same for me, minus the reflashing. I've f
yochaigal wrote:
> Usable as a day phone??? I think the Fat and Dirty distro is completely
> usable as a day phone... I should know (I use it every day with minimal
> changes... any issues I have I just reflash).
>
>
>
I think we need to be moving towards a situation where flashing is
consider
Usable as a day phone??? I think the Fat and Dirty distro is completely
usable as a day phone... I should know (I use it every day with minimal
changes... any issues I have I just reflash).
Ajay Kumar wrote:
>
> Somewhat similar utility to what Brian said:
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:00 AM
Somewhat similar utility to what Brian said:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Brian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They are targeted at "hospitality and healthcare" industry. They are
> just WiFi phones, no GSM no Linux.
> Both of these apps have staff that are constantly moving around and
Paraphrasing Michael
> In what ways can you extend the FreeRunner...
I was looking at WiFi IP phones yesterday at Voipsupply.org and they
have some in the $300-$600 range.
They are targeted at "hospitality and healthcare" industry. They are
just WiFi phones, no GSM no Linux.
Both of these apps hav
Michael Shiloh wrote:
>> My old phone works as a daily phone. I bought the FR for what I did not
>> have - misery.
Sorry everyone, I found that comment amusing and was going to respond in
some clever way, then changed my mind, and unfortunately sent the
partially composed message.
To paraphras
esday 26 August 2008 16:46:28 Chelsea Wei wrote:
>
>> Openmoko is pleased to be invited for an open source day event on
>> Software Freedom Day in Singapore.
>>
>> We will love to have some openmoko presence in Singapore; nevertheless,
>> we are small understaf
rce day event on
> Software Freedom Day in Singapore.
>
> We will love to have some openmoko presence in Singapore; nevertheless,
> we are small understaffed team, so we will love if some of you could
> commit to helping us.
>
> Software Freedom Day in Singapore will be held at
Openmoko is pleased to be invited for an open source day event on
Software Freedom Day in Singapore.
We will love to have some openmoko presence in Singapore; nevertheless,
we are small understaffed team, so we will love if some of you could
commit to helping us.
Software Freedom Day in
I don't think you can compare Peermeta with the Openmoko platform. The
Openmoko platform is designed to be an Open Source platform for Open
Source Handsets - and is meant to be a platform that can be built upon
- not just for "Web 2.0" access. Peermeta seems to be a proprietary
closed system with a
*About Peermeta*
Peermeta is a pioneer in Web 2.0 enabled software platforms for intelligent
end points utilizing mobile broadband infrastructure. The Peermeta solution
enables mobile access to Any Content, on Any Device, on Any Network, at Any
Time. Peermeta provides a method for tapping into th
"FREE YOUR IMAGINATION & INNOVATION" AFTER " FREE YOUR PHONE "!!!
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
* Tomasz Zielinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070115 15:07]:
> 2007/1/14, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >c) without being online all the time, you probably need to use it
> >interactivly. 144B/s is way to slow for sensible feedback in the 1-2
> >seconds a user might accept to wait.
>
> Well
2007/1/14, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
c) without being online all the time, you probably need to use it
interactivly. 144B/s is way to slow for sensible feedback in the 1-2
seconds a user might accept to wait.
Well, think about long wave submarine communication channel, which can
se
> If your phone can receive data over a voice channel, you have less of
> a reason to pay your service provider for a separate "data package".
> This would be especially nice for someone like me who only subcribes
> to the "bare bones" plan, but still has minutes left over at the end
> of the month
* Bryan Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070113 15:32]:
> On 1/13/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If your phone can receive data over a voice channel, you have less of
> >> a reason to pay your service provider for a separate "data package".
> >> This would be especially nice for some
On 1/13/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If your phone can receive data over a voice channel, you have less of
> a reason to pay your service provider for a separate "data package".
> This would be especially nice for someone like me who only subcribes
> to the "bare bones" plan,
32 matches
Mail list logo
