Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
two reasons:
* Debug programs and drivers (faster debugging?)
* Heighten security
?
Have no idea how the performance impact might be.
http://grsecurity.net/
Quote: ...
[02/10] Official grsecurity/PaX support on ARM
[01/25
Glenn glenn.mh...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
two reasons:
I think the main goal should be to upstream our changes, not add new
changes that are not upstream.
* Debug programs and drivers (faster debugging?)
What has grsecurity
At 0:06 +0200 30/12/10, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Glenn glenn.mh...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
two reasons:
I think the main goal should be to upstream our changes, not add new
changes that are not upstream.
* Debug programs
Glenn glenn.mh...@gmail.com writes:
What has grsecurity to do with debugging?
On there home page they write:
# Prevention of arbitrary code execution, regardless of the technique
used (stack smashing, heap corruption, etc)
# Prevention of arbitrary code execution in the kernel
#
В Срд, 29/12/2010 в 23:28 +0100, Glenn пишет:
At 0:06 +0200 30/12/10, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Glenn glenn.mh...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
two reasons:
I think the main goal should be to upstream our changes, not add new
...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
two reasons:
I think the main goal should be to upstream our changes, not add new
changes that are not upstream.
* Debug programs and drivers (faster debugging?)
What has grsecurity to do
At 23:38 +0100 29/12/10, Vinzenz Hersche wrote:
Glenn, i like to try this for a kernel.. it should need just be a patched
kernel (so need to recompile) and a loaded kernel or what do you think?
i don't know so much about cross-compile, but i like to learn it.. if also
someone else like to join
Vinzenz Hersche hers...@puzzle.ch writes:
it should need just be a patched
kernel (so need to recompile) and a loaded kernel or what do you think?
...a loaded module, of course.. sry, typo.. :)
I don't think grsec can be a separate module.
___
At 23:38 +0100 29/12/10, Vinzenz Hersche wrote:
Glenn, i like to try this for a kernel.. it should need just be a patched
kernel (so need to recompile) and a loaded kernel or what do you think?
i don't know so much about cross-compile, but i like to learn it.. if also
someone else like to join
9 matches
Mail list logo
