gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Bin Chen
Hi, I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time of the response, another unsolicited command sent to the AP and the name is the same: AT+CREG? +CREG: 2 (1) +CREG: 0,1 (2) The (1) is an unsolicited c

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
Am Mo 2. Juni 2008 schrieb Bin Chen: > Hi, > > I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition > has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time > of the response, another unsolicited command sent to the AP and the > name is the same: > > AT+CREG? > >

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: > I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition > has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time > of the response, another unsolicited command sent to the AP and the > name is the same: > > AT+CREG? > > +

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Bin Chen
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: >> I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition >> has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time >> of the response, an

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Monday 02 June 2008 15:11:17 Bin Chen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: > >> I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition > >> has been processed. Suppose a com

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
Am Mo 2. Juni 2008 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: > > I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition > > has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during the wait time > > of the response, another unsolicited command s

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Bin Chen
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 02 June 2008 15:11:17 Bin Chen wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: >> >> I am just looking

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Monday 02 June 2008 15:31:57 Bin Chen wrote: > >> > 1.) Disable sending unsolicited responses between commands. There's a > >> > 07.07 command to control that. > >> > > >> > 2.) Allow sending unsolicited responses at all times (this is better > >> > for latency) and dedicate an own GSM channel f

Re: gsmd correctness question

2008-06-02 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Monday 02 June 2008 16:45:19 Joerg Reisenweber wrote: > Am Mo 2. Juni 2008 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > On Monday 02 June 2008 11:34:07 Bin Chen wrote: > > > I am just looking at the code of gsmd2, I doubt whether a condition > > > has been processed. Suppose a command is send but during