Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Badru Ntege
On 11/7/16, 9:14 PM, "Seun Ojedeji" wrote: Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 7 Nov 2016 11:26 p.m., "Owen DeLong" wrote: > > Really, if there is such overwhelming desire by the community to remove the > CEO that it reaches this threshold, do you believe it is good gover

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Badru Ntege
On 11/7/16, 12:12 PM, "Mark Elkins" wrote: > >I also believe if a standing director moves to a different region then >after 6 months must resign? > I think this is something to consider makes sense since it distorts the regional representation aspect Regards > __

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 07/11/2016 20:14, Seun Ojedeji wrote: > Sent from my LG G4 > Kindly excuse brevity and typos > > On 7 Nov 2016 11:26 p.m., "Owen DeLong" > wrote: >> >> Really, if there is such overwhelming desire by the community to > remove the CEO that it reaches this threshold, do

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Seun Ojedeji
Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 7 Nov 2016 11:26 p.m., "Owen DeLong" wrote: > > Really, if there is such overwhelming desire by the community to remove the CEO that it reaches this threshold, do you believe it is good governance for the board to keep such person in place? >

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Owen DeLong
For hiring, I completely agree with you. For firing, I think that the bar here is sufficiently high that it is not unreasonable to allow it to apply to the CEO as well. Really, if there is such overwhelming desire by the community to remove the CEO that it reaches this threshold, do you believe

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Andrew Alston
Dewole, That information is already available based on space allocated. It would be a violation of the MSA and privacy clauses to disclose any application before it is granted. The whois database contains the rest of the information as does the delegation database, just a matter of correlatin

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Boubakar Barry
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Mark Elkins wrote: > > When we are in the Soft-Landing part of IPv4 or better still, the last > 25% of soft-landing - then maybe this could be an appropriate idea. The > community can view and therefore report on any suspicious applications. > This would probably m

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 07/11/2016 17:15, Dewole Ajao wrote: > Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do > not attempt to declare anything on my behalf. I'm afraid that was the first thought that came to mind. I'm probably not alone. My thought is also not about you, but the idea. > If

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Responsibility of requesting entities is what I meant, Mark. Please do not attempt to declare anything on my behalf. If an applicant knows the community sees in realtime, he/she is less likely to put in phony stuff that just wastes the hostmasters' time and increases the time taken to process

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 07/11/2016 16:53, Dewole Ajao wrote: > Once a week is good. ARIN has a daily issued feed but that's a bit > different from what I'm suggesting. > > I agree the actual allocated/assigned ranges need not be disclosed; I do > however think that sharing the names of (applicant) organizations will

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Once a week is good. ARIN has a daily issued feed but that's a bit different from what I'm suggesting. I agree the actual allocated/assigned ranges need not be disclosed; I do however think that sharing the names of (applicant) organizations will help with responsibility and possibly reduce th

Re: [Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
Interesting. I think though a once-a-week stats figure would be sufficient - perhaps with a projected end date? I've seen that before somewhere AFRINIC should not give out the names of the organisations receiving the address space or the actual ranges themselves though. On 07/11/2016 16:29, D

[Community-Discuss] Regular updates on Number Resource Applications and Approvals

2016-11-07 Thread Dewole Ajao
Dear Community, I was wondering if anyone else thinks it would be useful to see weekly/daily details (in human readable format) of new applications and approvals for Internet number resources perhaps as a weekly/daily email from AFRINIC to this (or the members) list. Given increased depletio

Re: [Community-Discuss] Bylaws changes

2016-11-07 Thread Mark Elkins
On 05/11/2016 12:29, Alan Barrett wrote: > >> On 5 Nov 2016, at 14:53, Seun Ojedeji wrote: >> >> Hello Alan, >> >> Thanks for sending this across, a few "personal" comments below: >> >> 1. For item 7: I think 13.8b is sufficient hence 13.8c may not be needed; We >> don't have to formerly restr