@ Owen
Interesting insights.
True GDPR is EU person-specific rather than EU Citizen specific. U also
rightly point out this is a broader term compared to the narrow citizen
specific term I had imagined. Dont you then think that this expands the
risk exposure rather than limit it?
Either way, wh
Exactly, GDPR is about both citizens and residents.
Anyone living in EU is also protected.
If Afrinic host mailing list and databases with may contain EU-person data, it
is subjected to GDPR. There is no doubt in that.
After all, what it really matters is that Maurituis has an explicit
Dear Owen,
At 05:52 PM 11-07-2019, Owen DeLong wrote:
While the fact that Mauritius stupidly (IMHO) signed an agreement
making this paragraph problematic, many other nations in Africa have
not and so it's again questionable whether the law can be applied to
entities outside of AfriNIC that are
Hi SM,
On 7/10/19 8:25 PM, S. Moonesamy wrote:
> There was a thread in 2018 about data protection [1]. There is ETS 223
> [2] which is a modernization of the convention about data protection.
Thanks for sharing the archive link.
The email mentions the following:
"The Board believes that th
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 00:29 , John Walu wrote:
>
> @ Owen
>
> Interesting insights.
>
> True GDPR is EU person-specific rather than EU Citizen specific. U also
> rightly point out this is a broader term compared to the narrow citizen
> specific term I had imagined. Dont you then think that
Dear Ish,
At 10:24 AM 12-07-2019, Ish Sookun wrote:
The email mentions the following:
"The Board believes that these regulations are not a barrier to
publication of the WHOIS data [..]"
and,
"The Board further believes that the biggest changes required by
AFRINIC are in docum
