On 31 Jul 2021, at 22:02, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jul 31, 2021, at 03:58 , Nishal Goburdhan
wrote:
So your claim is
[i usually don’t post here, but i’d like to clear up one thing]:
no owen. that is not my claim. what i said (which you inadvertently
seemed to have snipped) was that this is
On 14 Jul 2021, at 12:58, Andrew Alston via Community-Discuss wrote:
[snip]
it makes AfriNIC god judge and jury ..
[snip]
since this is now in - y’know, an *actual* court, with, y’know, an
*actual* judge - how about we let that actual court weigh in, and not
create unnecessary, and unwante
On 16 Apr 2021, at 1:46, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message <7913c33a-ca19-45c0-8cc2-1d0a9167d...@controlfreak.co.za>,
"Nishal Goburdhan" wrote:
https://bgp.he.net/AS398968
that is not a real-time view; even the good people at he.net will
tell
you so.
Facinating.
On 15 Apr 2021, at 21:06, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message <04590609-e26b-4c6d-9e83-4134e3f52...@afrinic.net>,
AFRINIC Communication wrote:
As we find ourselves turning to the Internet more and more to
manage our lives, internet routing and security becomes an
increasingly important topi
On 31 Dec 2020, at 17:56, Noah wrote:
> If that bogon ASN still continues to be routed by another AS
thanks for cleaning that up.
this is a PSA that the cidr-report produces a report for these.
see: https://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/bogus-as-advertisements.html
-n.
___
On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:29, Libra via Community-Discuss wrote:
> Noah are you member or LIR?
[snip nonsense]
hey noah, (and other bona fide people)
please don’t feed the trolls.
it only makes them hungrier, and appear more often.
—n.
___
Community-Di
On 24 Dec 2020, at 14:25, Ish Sookun wrote:
Instead, I see you are arguing with a Board Director who is only
telling
you that AFRINIC has a regulatory constraint in giving you access to
data it possesses.
this is not quite a regulatory constraint. this information is, or was,
already in the
On 17 Nov 2019, at 13:09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss
wrote:
I don’t think AFRINIC publishes an attendee list, an even less with
contact emails, so not sure how that will work.
At least, I just looked at the website (and recent events websites)
and couldn’t find it.
many years
On 31 May 2019, at 18:46, francis asiboh via Community-Discuss wrote:
Dear board members and all members of the community
All Afrinic services (Whois, RPKI, Afrinic.net, etc..) were down
yesterday
you didn’t mention DNS. if you did, it would have invalidated the
“all” in your sentence.
t
On 20 Dec 2018, at 17:14, Gregoire Ehoumi via Community-Discuss wrote:
You suddenly discovered a bug in the system? Congrats
But I see no bug . The normal course of proceedings follow the RSA
then the policies and the BCP's.
when the policy that allowed afrinic space to be resold to other afr
On 10 Jan 2018, at 17:28, Kangamutima zabika Christophe wrote:
Monsieur Barrett,
Pouvez vous nous éclairer sur l'état d'avancement du processus de
traduction des pages web du site internet d'Afrinic en français? Un
mois après AFRINIC27 où vous et votre administration avez promis à
la communa
On 09 Jun 2017, at 19:31, Danny wrote:
> Local host should always ensure high availability by having at least 2
> service providers regardless of how many fiber links one provider can bring
> into the conference after all even during the workshop week, Liquid internet
> was down for 2 hours due
On 16 Oct 2016, at 10:56, Andrew Alston wrote:
Just as another note –
I am also working on something that will take the rest of the
allocated prefixes (the ones that are announced), and tie them back to
the originating ASN
hi andrew,
doesn’t afrinic do this already (they used to, with the
On 5 Oct 2016, at 8:39, Noah wrote:
On 4 Oct 2016 22:12, "Hytham El-Nakhal" wrote:
(if 100 members trust one specific member so they all have equal
rights
to issue a proxy for him).
Really... and you dont see this as a problem.
no. because it’s a member’s *right* to trust (your word
On 12 Jul 2016, at 23:38, John Ngwoke wrote:
> Since the chair Sunday has assured us that this matter
> will be treated by the board in their next meeting. We have confidence in
> the board members, that is why we voted them. So we have to trust them on
> this, knowing that what ever decision they
On 13 Jul 2016, at 11:30, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote:
The delay in considering the appointment of Mr. Ntege to the CoE,
whether intentional or not, whether at discretion of board or not, it
is showing the dysfunctional characteristic of the board.
i respectfully disagree. if it’s “at discreti
On 13 Jul 2016, at 7:12, Omo Oaiya wrote:
On 12 July 2016 at 20:45, Nishal Goburdhan
wrote:
really omo? that’s hardly sporting of you.
because an interpretation does not match your own, does *not* make
that
interpretation incorrect.
i’m simply giving you (this public list) my
On 12 Jul 2016, at 13:26, Omo Oaiya wrote:
Let's get off this micromanagement train.
yes indeed, let’s!
"There shall be a Council of Elders appointed by the Board comprising
a
maximum of six (6) former chairpersons of AFRINIC who have left the
Board.
Their advisory role is commensurate wi
On 12 Jul 2016, at 11:32, Honest Ornella GANKPA wrote:
Hello Nishal
If the position is not automatic,
in reading the text, this does appear to be the case.
then on which criteria are the elders
selected? What is the process of selection ?
the bylaws do not specify. just like how they don
On 11 Jul 2016, at 20:32, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote:
Hi Nishal,
hi marcus,
Why respond to this email when it is specifically addressed to the CEO
and the Chair?
i believe the CEO’s email address is: ceo [at] afrinic.net.
or, it used to be; the afrinic team can help you with that. you
On 11 Jul 2016, at 18:39, Honest Ornella GANKPA wrote:
and it seems that automatically every former chair become part of the
CoE.
http://afrinic.net/en/about/our-structure/council-of-elders
the url that you reference says:
“.. The AFRINIC Bylaw (Section 16) allows the Board to appoint..”
“al
On 25 Jun 2016, at 15:49, Andrew Alston wrote:
Just need to point out, RPKI is a *choice*, and there could be many
reasons for people NOT running RPKI, that go beyond just AfriNIC
promoting it or not.
correct. no-one is forcing anything on anyone, andrew :-)
I for one am not on that list
On 25 Jun 2016, at 14:40, sergekbk wrote:
The point was about poor global adoption and how we can do better.
.. and i’ll ask again: (if this matters to you (generic netop), as it
clearly did to the OP), is your ASN listed, and if not why not ?
—n.
On 25 Jun 2016, at 13:54, Honest Ornella GANKPA wrote:
Hi Nishal,
hi,
2016-06-25 3:22 GMT+01:00 Nishal Goburdhan
:
On 24 Jun 2016, at 21:06, Honest Ornella GANKPA wrote:
It is quite scary actually that even the RIR is promoting such bad
practices on the pretense of simplicity
i
On 24 Jun 2016, at 21:06, Honest Ornella GANKPA wrote:
It is quite scary actually that even the RIR is promoting such bad
practices on the pretense of simplicity
i disagree.
and i’m not quite sure you see the double standard here.
you (meaning: a general user) are happy to use your user name
On 24 Jun 2016, at 18:07, serge ilunga wrote:
Some of the bad things may affect us, as globally we failed to adopt
RPKI*
and to improve the IRR and the Whois.
[snip]
(*)http://rpki.surfnet.nl/perrir.html
so, i’m guessing this is in reference, on this website, to the
“zero” reference, in t
On 23 Jun 2016, at 18:35, Lydea Akiriza wrote:
> But now it gets me thinking...since Legacy Resource Holders have the
> OPTION:-) of only becoming AFRINIC members 'voluntarily',how best would
> AFRINIC as an entity encourage Legacy Resource Holders to actually become
> members.
eventually … the
27 matches
Mail list logo