Re: The Appearance Extension on a Classic II

-- ...and I forgot to add that the IIci has the Runtime enabler ext, vers. 1.0.1 installed. The SE/30 doesn't. Can I use the Runtime enabler from 7.5.3 in 7.01? dan_A -- Compact Macs is sponsored by . Support Low End Mac

Re: The Appearance Extension on a Classic II

At 7:11 PM -0800 on 12/29/02, Gamba wrote: > >My URL is good, but got mangled in the emails. >Well done, but you cut off too much of the ReadMe. >It seems to indirectly imply that the CFM-68K Runtime Enabler is required >for 7.1? > >Gamba > -- Hi Gamba I didn

Re: The Appearance Extension on a Classic II

>At 4:42 PM -0800 on 12/29/02, Gamba wrote: >>All the details are in the ReadMe that is in >>>t. >>hqx> > >I tried to download the file but apple must have moved the dl site. I >found it and downloaded it here: >http:

Re: The Appearance Extension on a Classic II

At 4:42 PM -0800 on 12/29/02, Gamba wrote: > >Any reason for not using 1.0.3 instead of 1.0.2? >1.0.3 eliminates the need for a different Date and Time cp. >It also includes a version of the Appearance cp just for pre OS 8, which >fixes the unrecognized 'APPL' filetype problem. > >All the details a

Re: The Appearance Extension on a Classic II

Bill Brown wrote: >I've tried the "Appearance Set" consisting of the Appearance Extension >1.0.2, Appearance 1.0.2 CP, & Date &Time 8.0.1 CP. The results are >promising but problematic. >Bill Any reason for not using 1.0.3 instead of 1.0.2? 1.0.3 eliminates the need for a different Date and Time

Classic II cum iMac (was: The Appearance Extension on a ClassicII)

Yo compacters everywhere, A status report of success with some good help from our listers. And I've changed the name of the thread because we are moving on from the Appearance Extension issue-I think we have a definitive solution. Lister Bob aka: ELN/rlf9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> put me on to:

Re: SVGA on a Compact Mac!

At 14:18 -0500 on 29/12/02, Scott Holder wrote: >Probably should take this over to the CC boards, but any idea about >compatibility with Takky mods? I have a mostly-complete Takky (booted it Can't foresee any difficulties. The 575 and CC analogue boards are almost identical except for a few high

Re: SVGA on a Compact Mac!

At 08:30 AM 12/29/2002 +, you wrote: >Indeed. A straight (a/b + yoke) replacement is simple, as long as you >have a 575 l/b in there already. If you swap all three elements at >once, there's no soldering at all to do, because it really is a 575 in >a CC case. > >Stuart Probably should take thi

Printing from older Macs to an OS X shared printer

A couple of months ago, there was some animated discussion about how it might be possible to share a modern USB or similar printer from an OS X Mac to older systems. If you're feeling determined and don't mind getting your hands dirty, here is how you can print in colour or black and white to a

Re: SVGA on a Compact Mac!

On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 11:34 pm, the pickle wrote: > Yep, just don't do the SVGA mod to the 575 board. It doesn't matter if you do, of course, because the SVGA mod still allows use of VGA resolution as an option. Stuart -- Compact Macs is sponsored by .

Re: SVGA on a Compact Mac!

On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 10:35 pm, Scott Holder wrote: > Hmm, this seems rather more significant as a replacement for the CC's > rare > analogue board than 800x600. Can it still run at 640x480? > > I think I've killed my CC's analog board, so I'm interested :) > Indeed. A straight (a/