missing mode32

Hi Every time I try to download mode32, I get problems. My PM 7600 can download it, but then says the file is 0k. My G4 can download it, and registers its size, but when I transfer it to any other machine via FTP or CD, its 0k again. Ditto on my PC. I can't just download it on my

Re: Mode32

Darren wrote: > > > > >Hope th

Re: Mode32

em>MODE32_7.5.txt <ftp://ftp.apple.com/Apple_Support_Area/Apple_Software_Updates/English-North_American/Macintosh/System/Other_System/MODE32_7.5.txt> Hope that helps. dhill wrote >Didn't look at the Faq, huh. Must be pickle's reply. I ran a search >on LEM and found the

Mode32

Didn't look at the Faq, huh. Must be pickle's reply. I ran a search on LEM and found the FAQ about Mode32. Clicked on the link which took me to Apple. I have eye squint from looking at that. I even went to Jag's place, and he has that so screwed up, no one will ever find any

Re: Mode32

>Where is a quick download for this jewel? How come I can't find it anywhere? Because you didn't have a look at the faq. -- -- Check out the System 6 Heaven: http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html Subscribe to the LEM system6

Mode32

Where is a quick download for this jewel? How come I can't find it anywhere? Dale -- Caddo County Harpman - ccharpman! "If you can't harp the blues, then you ain't a harp player." (Eladicious 5,02) ADD RE to TIRED and you get ... me. X-Public School Educator. Macintosh is to computers as Mer

Re: Mode32 1.2

Sorry, link not displayed properly, my fault. please excuse last post. thank you. -- Compact Macs is sponsored by and... PowerON Computer Services REPLACEMENT PARTS in STOCK Drives, CD-ROMs, RAM, Mac OS SW, Power Supply

Re: Mode32 1.2

Gamba wrote: >You can read about all the evils of it here: >rican/Macintosh/System/Other_System/MODE32_7.5.txt> > Not on this browser. ;) > > >Gamba > > -- Compact Macs is

Re: Mode32 1.2

>would you explain all of the faults and errors running 1.2 >will cause? You can read about all the evils of it here: Gamba

Re: Mode32 1.2

Ok Vintage List Nanny mk1, since you've gone into bat for me, would you explain all of the faults and errors running 1.2 will cause? Once again, for those unsure. For those of you unsure of Marks actions: http://www.umich.edu/~archive/ and a check the dates in the last modified should clarify thi

Re: Mode32 1.2

>I simply wanted to go some way to protecting unaware users from >the serious damage this can cause. > I read my mail rather late last night and became quite despondent. Jeff pretty much summarized my thoughts and I won't beat a dead horse, but consider this: The best way to protect unaware us

Re: Mode32 1.2

On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 07:34 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: > What prompted you to send this, when in all of Macdom there are many, > many, > many, many folks who know of the problems with this version of Mode 32? Many, newbies in particular are not aware, this was what motivated me. > How co

Re: Mode32 1.2

-- >From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Compact Macs) >Subject: Mode32 1.2 >Date: Sat, Mar 30, 2002, 9:23 AM > > I sent the following note to the UMICH archive. > >> It has come to my attention, via another person, t

Re: Mode32 1.2

>Subject: Re: Mode32 1.2 >From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 05:35 PM, Gamba wrote: > >>> Is 1.2 more useful for older systems a

Re: Mode32 1.2

t;broken software and are not updating, unless anyone has a major vested >interest in it staying alive (website links etc. - Gamba?). I only asked >them to update Mode32, it's not exactly an effort worthy of a days work >and I don't think, just because I asked them to change a little

Re: Mode32 1.2

nyone has a major vested interest in it staying alive (website links etc. - Gamba?). I only asked them to update Mode32, it's not exactly an effort worthy of a days work and I don't think, just because I asked them to change a little thing, they will take it all offline. Anyway I

Re: Mode32 1.2

>>However I doubt, from what you say about >>UMICH, that they will remove it or update it > >Agreed. They may take down the whole directory! Mark, it's best not to wake a sleeping dog in situations like this. Gamba -- Compact Macs is sponsored by

Re: Mode32 1.2

>> 7.5 is fully backward compatible. >Does everyone comply on this point? Quoting from the Connectix ReadMe for version 7.5, "MODE32 only works with System 7.0 and later." >However I doubt, from what you say about >UMICH, that they will remove it or update

Re: Mode32 1.2

one comply on this point? I need total piece of mind that my pursuit to eradicate the dodgy version of Mode32 will render some users of older system versions unable to use Mode32. I have 7.5 on my SE/30 (20MB RAM) and it works in 7.1, 7.1.2 and 7.5.3. > 1.2 is still being distributed

Re: Mode32 1.2

>Is 1.2 more useful for older systems and OS versions? Otherwise why is >it still being distributed. >Mark Benson 1.2 is not more useful for older systems. 7.5 is fully backward compatible. 1.2 is still being distributed because some web sites are not maintained or updated. UMICH certainly falls

Mode32 1.2

I sent the following note to the UMICH archive. > It has come to my attention, via another person, that you appear to be > distributing an out-dated an potentially damaging version of the > 'Mode32' extension for the Macintosh. The version, I believe to be 1.2, > of this ex