[compiz] metacity support

2006-10-06 Thread snop
Here are some pictures This is compiz with metacity support and gconftool-2 -s /apps/gwd/use_metacity_theme -t bool true http://img237.imageshack.us/my.php?image=compiz1rh6.png and this is metacity http://img100.imageshack.us/my.php?image=metacity1be1.png Is metacity support functionall now ? Or

Re: [compiz] Tried out Beryl (Animation pugin)

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Dransfield
David Reveman wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:30 -0500, Erkin Bahceci wrote: Hi, I had thought that inter-plugin communication was possible through "privates" without adding anything to compiz.h, but apparently it's not (hence the name privates :) ). I guess this is only possible through X w

[Fwd: Re: [compiz] compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Mirco Müller
Argl, this was meant to go to the list and not only to Hanno! -- email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] www - http://macslow.thepimp.net lowfat - http://macslow.thepimp.net/sponsor-it --- Begin Message --- Am Freitag, den 06.10.2006, 01:03 +0200 schrieb Hanno Böck: > Sounds good to document coding style and s

[compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Colin Guthrie
Mirco Müller wrote: > Another thing, which might be regarded as superfluous (as it serves no > real technical purpose), but worth considering. Give compiz a genuine > logo to identify it with. The beryl-project is doing the right thing in > that area (using gem-stones for its various parts).

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Dransfield
(also, please note that I do not consider beryl as the fork, but the cvs versions many moons ago with extra patches applied - this was the fork and it's several months old - beryl is just a name change IMO). I think this is where you are wrong, if you studied the code then you will see a maj

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Who
On 10/6/06, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mirco Müller wrote: > Another thing, which might be regarded as superfluous (as it serves no > real technical purpose), but worth considering. Give compiz a genuine > logo to identify it with. The beryl-project is doing the right thing in

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Guillaume
Well, 1) was coded exactly at the same time as in upstream, and beryl versionning is quite shorter in terms of code. The plugins have only one new line... nothing more, while in compiz there's a new function for every plugin. 2) The new coding style wasn't included to make things harder to backpor

Re: [compiz] metacity support

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 22:05 +0200, sNop wrote: > I have installed compiz with metacity support, my metacity libs are > 2.16.3 and I used this command to on theme support > gconftool-2 -s /apps/gwd/use_metacity_theme -t bool true > but I can`t change border of windows in gnome-theme-manager I can c

Re: [compiz] compiz coding style

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
Yes, we should start updating the www.freedesktop.org/Software/Compiz page more. It's a wiki so feel free to update it. -David On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 01:03 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: > Hi David, > > Sounds good to document coding style and stuff, however I think this and > other > development doc

Re: [Fwd: Re: [compiz] compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
I agree with all of this and I'm currently making sure that we'll soon have a nice web-site for compiz. Anyone interested we'll be able to help out once we get the initial thing up. -David On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 14:11 +0200, Mirco Müller wrote: > Argl, this was meant to go to the list and not only

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 14:09 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > Mirco Müller wrote: > > Another thing, which might be regarded as superfluous (as it serves no > > real technical purpose), but worth considering. Give compiz a genuine > > logo to identify it with. The beryl-project is doing the right t

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 16:36 +0100, Who wrote: > On 10/6/06, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mirco Müller wrote: > > > Another thing, which might be regarded as superfluous (as it serves > > > no > > > real technical purpose), but worth considering. Give compiz a genuine > > > lo

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:17 +0200, Guillaume wrote: > Well, 1) was coded exactly at the same time as in upstream, and beryl > versionning is quite shorter in terms of code. The plugins have only > one new line... nothing more, while in compiz there's a new function > for every plugin. That's becau

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Dransfield
Just a quick note, this does not sound to be the right place for Beryl critics, it's the compiz mailing list. What you're doing here is somehow useless, it's just bad propaganda against Beryl. We're really open to any critic/discussion, but not here ;) What I would really like to do is have c

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Dransfield
I did one of these. See http://mailforwho.googlepages.com/Compiz_Logo.svg and http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5525/1331/1600/Compiz%20Logos2.1.jpg It looks good but I think it's too specific to some of the initial features of compiz (cube, decorations) and I'd like to have something m

Re: [compiz] configuration support in dbus plugin

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:29 +0200, lowfi wrote: > Hi, > > I think there's a little bug in the dbus connetion handling. > It tries to close a shared connection, but shared connections should only be > unreferenced, never closed. Yes, that seems correct. -David __

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Shawn Starr
>They could have created a good website and community around the fdo >version of compiz. I don't see why creating a good website and community >forced them into maintaining there own version of compiz. I think people were trying to get a hold of you somehow but felt no communication. Although I s

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Dan Winship
>>> Before beryl became beryl quite a few people had done compiz logo's (the >>> red cube with three graphics on it). >>> >> I did one of these. See >> http://mailforwho.googlepages.com/Compiz_Logo.svg >> and >> http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5525/1331/1600/Compiz%20Logos2.1.jpg > > It looks

Re: [compiz] Re: [Fwd: Re: compiz coding style]

2006-10-06 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
Hello David et al! "DR" == David Reveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DR> They could have created a good website and community around the fdo DR> version of compiz. I don't see why creating a good website and DR> community forced them into maintaining there own version of compiz. I'm sorry, Da

[compiz] solving plugin dependency issues

2006-10-06 Thread David Reveman
The dependency checking currently provided is clearly not good enough. There's currently two issues with the plugins that exist in the compiz repository. plane plugin conflicts with cube and rotate plugin, zoom plugin should probably work with either cube or plane but currently only loads when cub

Re: [compiz] solving plugin dependency issues

2006-10-06 Thread Guillaume
Hello, We already done something similar in beryl to fix these conflicting plugins issues. What we did was to introduce two new rules, CompPluginRuleConflicts and CompPluginRuleAfterAlt. The first one prevents two incompatible plugin from being loaded at once, and the later one allows a plugin to