[compiz] [PATCH] minimize doesn't respect no core instance flag

2007-03-07 Thread Danny Baumann
Hi, In current git, minimize doesn't respect the PAINT_WINDOW_NO_CORE_INSTANCE_MASK flag set by other plugins. I noticed that especially in group: Tabbed windows are hidden by setting PAINT_WINDOW_NO_CORE_INSTANCE_MASK. When these windows are minimized together with their group, minimize draws

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Mike Dransfield
Patrick Niklaus wrote: We just want to get some feedback on these ideas. If you are interested I can provide a patch for compiz too. Thanks for showing us this. I have a couple of questions though. What are the major pros/cons of using this method over plain old libraries? Do you have any

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Danny Baumann
Hi, What are the major pros/cons of using this method over plain old libraries? They plug into the normal plugin infrastructure and don't add the need for plugin writers to mess around with dlopen(), dlsym() and such. Basically, they work like normal libraries and look like a plugin. A large

Re: [compiz] A few more bugs...

2007-03-07 Thread Vasek Potocek
2) This one should be easily reproducible: - Shade one window (W1) on a viewport. - Click another window (W2) to move focus on it. - Unshade W1 by double-clicking its title bar. - Click W2 again - it gets focus, but graphically it still looks like W1 has it. Repeated clicking on W2 doesn't help.

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Mike Dransfield
Danny Baumann wrote: What are the major pros/cons of using this method over plain old libraries? They plug into the normal plugin infrastructure and don't add the need for plugin writers to mess around with dlopen(), dlsym() and such. Basically, they work like normal libraries and look

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Dennis Kasprzyk
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 16:59 schrieb Mike Dransfield: Danny Baumann wrote: What are the major pros/cons of using this method over plain old libraries? They plug into the normal plugin infrastructure and don't add the need for plugin writers to mess around with dlopen(), dlsym() and

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Mike Dransfield
Danny Baumann wrote: Other than being notified when it is added or removed I don't see how it is beneficial. Using a library would mean that the functionality could always be guaranteed. There might be functionality which isn't needed to be guaranteed. The animation subplugins were an

Re: Re : [compiz] [PATCH] Actions restrictions

2007-03-07 Thread David Reveman
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:15 +0100, Cedric wrote: 2007/3/6, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Cedric wrote: Any problems, just let me know. - David Yes, in addWindow(), windowInitPlugins() should be call before recalcWindowActions(). Otherwise, you

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Mike Dransfield
Dennis Kasprzyk wrote: Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 16:59 schrieb Mike Dransfield: Danny Baumann wrote: What are the major pros/cons of using this method over plain old libraries? They plug into the normal plugin infrastructure and don't add the need for plugin writers to mess

Re: [compiz] decoration flashing with current upstream

2007-03-07 Thread David Reveman
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 03:47 +0100, Mirco Müller wrote: Greetings everybody! I just git pull'ed compiz and after compiling and installing it, I started experiencing the decorations flashing and windows not being updated correctly. Sofar I was not able to revert to a state identifying

Re: [compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread Patrick Niklaus
2007/3/7, Mike Dransfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It could also be disabled with an option, or at compile time. If it was a really big library then you could use dlopen, but this is just one function. Doing it through an option would be a real mess in the settings manager and just removing it at

[compiz] video plugin?

2007-03-07 Thread dragoran
Hello, I updated to current git and find the video plugin. What exactly is it supposed to do? I want to test it but I don't know exactly what to test Enabling it did not make any difference (it loaded successfully). ___ compiz mailing list

[compiz] compiz not running on server-1.3-branch

2007-03-07 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, I'm running latest server-1.3.-branch with git-mesa. compiz doesnt run and gives lots of these messages: compiz: pixmap 0x28b can't be bound to texture compiz: Couldn't bind redirected window 0x168 to texture compiz: pixmap 0x28d can't be bound to texture compiz: Couldn't bind

Re: [compiz] video plugin?

2007-03-07 Thread Andres Blanco
David wrote: On 3/5/07, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I've added a simple plugin to compiz that provides a way to render video efficiently on a composited desktop. A video playback client basically copies video data to a pixmap and sets an X property on a client window that describes

Re: [compiz] video plugin?

2007-03-07 Thread Mike Dransfield
dragoran wrote: Hello, I updated to current git and find the video plugin. What exactly is it supposed to do? I want to test it but I don't know exactly what to test Enabling it did not make any difference (it loaded successfully). All the information you need is here. You will need to

Re: [compiz] video plugin?

2007-03-07 Thread dragoran
thx I missed this mail... Andres Blanco wrote: David wrote: On 3/5/07, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I've added a simple plugin to compiz that provides a way to render video efficiently on a composited desktop. A video playback client basically copies video data to a pixmap and sets an

Re: [compiz] Blur bugs and slowdown :(

2007-03-07 Thread Dennis Kasprzyk
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 20:26 schrieb Bellegarde Cedric: Yes, you have multiple levels of blur here. The blurring behind the amarok window depends on the blurring behind the window below. We're not blurring windows here, we're blurring whatever is rendered behind the windows, which is a

[compiz] Plugin Library Interface

2007-03-07 Thread chriss kalogeropoulos
Except from the notifications on Load/Unload it does not offer anything but another framework to load dlls at runtime. I fail to see any real benefit ___ Χρησιμοποιείτε Yahoo!; Βαρεθήκατε τα ενοχλητικά

[compiz] Drawing interface

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Carr
More on the subject of the internal implementation than the method of communication, I believe a setup as follows for a drawing interface makes sense: Wrappable function: grabDrawingRequests , this would allow for multiple methods of communication and protocols to be implemented in plugins