On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:02:54PM +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011 21:00:23 you wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:07:46PM +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > problems: Compiz's KDE Plasma integration is moved to KDE's
> > > infrastructure and could be released in sync
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:07:46PM +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Up to now Compiz has done a great job of supporting our additions, so that
> Compiz users get the same level of integration as KWin users. Nevertheless
> due
> to the fact that releases are out of sync Compiz users do not get new
We were a little imprecise in our original announcement with regards to
moving away from freedesktop.org, which seems to have caused some confusion.
We are only moving away from the freedesktop.org infrastructure. NOT the
standards.
By moving away from freedesktop.org, we are:
- Shutting down bu
As 0.9 will contain numerous core-changes which are likely to affect both
behavior and plugin development, the recommended way of developing new
plugins throughout 0.9 will be to use the released developer versions, NOT
master.
The exceptions are plugins that are already part of the release and
pl
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:15:36PM +, Diogo Ferreira wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Kristian Lyngstol
> wrote:
>
> > I thought we removed place, or was that something that was agreed but never
> > executed?
>
> Do you mean plane?
So, right... I&#
I thought we removed place, or was that something that was agreed but never
executed?
The plugin has been virtually untouched since wall and expo got popular,
and I don't really want to support it for 0.8.
Unless someone has any strong objections, it'll be removed later this
evening. I'm sorry ab
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:47:02AM +0100, Guillaume Seguin wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 fév 2009 à 18:29:03 (-0300), Eduardo Gurgel a écrit :
> > It allows you to swap the geometry of two windows. Basically we changed
> > Static Switcher plugin to swap active window with another window.
>
> Well, I think
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Kristian Lyngstol wrote:
> Danny Baumann has agreed to do the actual tar-balls and release, as he has
> done for the Compiz 0.7 development branch.
To be precise, Danny is doing Compiz core and Guillaume Seguin is doing
what used to be Compiz Fusio
The Compiz 0.8.0 release will be the first release to include what was
formerly known as Compiz Fusion.
A complete feature and string freeze for Compiz 0.8 is in effect from
Friday 5th of February, 23:59 GMT. I urge anyone with patches to submit
them ASAP, regardless of their state.
During most
As a result of the general unrest in the Compiz community, a series of
conference calls were held to work out how to move forward. The minutes
of these conference calls have already been published, but no official
statements have been made, until now.
A council has been established, which will ult
I've been trying to come up with some good coding standards, but I've
realized that most of us already know most of this. So instead of trying to
define every aspect of how we code Compiz-code, I'll try to outline some of
the finer points. For a more complete list, you can review any of the many
co
(snippets)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:59:15PM +0100, Danny Baumann wrote:
> currently, we have a bunch of stuff in compiz core that is entirely
> Gnome specific, though it's designed to be general. What I mean is
> - arbitrary command bindings
> - terminal and screenshot command bindings
> - "main
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Dennis Kasprzyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've currently pushed a new branch called "compiz++" to the freedesktop
> repository, with some features I've been working on during last months.
> Because most of the features also require (BIG) changes to the plugins, I
What's the status of this branch?
I haven't seen any activity on it since march 2008, so I'm wondering if
it's abandoned or not?
If not, what's the plans for merging with core, what's the specific
benefits and disadvantages it brings?
Does the nomad branch depend on the object framework branch i
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Danny Baumann wrote:
> > > As for the messyness and longness of code, I can think of a few
> > > example that really need fixing straight away.
> > >
> > > display.c handleEvent()
> > > display.c addDisplay ()
> > > screen.c addScreen ()
> > > screen.c All
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:39:56AM +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Kristian Lyngstol
> wrote:
> > Where are we going?
(...)
> > We've constantly been waiting for something that will change everything,
> > and whether we call it an obje
Where are we going?
It's time to start thinking ahead and really figure out how to make Compiz
survive, specially in lieu of Dennis' suggestion.
The reality is that there has been the equivalent of no progress since the
merge. We've basically only been in maintenance mode. The reason for this,
fr
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Dennis Kasprzyk wrote:
> - No direct access to member variables: Everything is now done with
> getter and setter functions. This helps with the problem where every
> variable addition broke the plugin ABI. While this usually is not a
> problem in the develo
Excuse the cross posting, but it underlines the entire point quite nicely.
After the merge of Compiz and Beryl, we've still got two projects. That in
itself isn't a huge problem, but it's a bit problematic with regards to
mail (what list to choose?) and bug trackers.
Since we get very little traf
I just branched for 0.8, since Danny told me there was no reason not to.
There are still some bugs to work out of course, but since development has
been quiet lately, I figure it's time to branch so that we can:
1. Eventually get to the next stable release
2. Allow people to work more freely on m
Enhanced Zoom of Compiz Fusion currently offers all the functionality that
Desktop Zoom has, and then some. It's already heavily used as a default
zoom plugin, and having two zoom plugins only acts to confuse users and
increase the amount of code to maintain.
Unless someone has some strong objecti
21 matches
Mail list logo
