Re[2]: [compiz] Beryl and Compiz Merge: What's actually going on?

2007-03-30 Thread Denis F. Latypoff
Hello Kristian, Thursday, March 29, 2007, 12:11:41 AM, you wrote: On 3/28/07, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're making this into a bigger thing than what it is. Lets focus on solving the technical part first, most importantly move to having one core. I'm only talking

Re: [compiz] Beryl and Compiz Merge: What's actually going on?

2007-03-28 Thread Kristian Lyngstøl
On 3/28/07, David Reveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're making this into a bigger thing than what it is. Lets focus on solving the technical part first, most importantly move to having one core. I'm only talking about the code that's currently built into the compiz binary, none of the

Re: [compiz] Beryl and Compiz Merge: What's actually going on?

2007-03-27 Thread Mirco Müller
Am Sonntag, den 25.03.2007, 08:07 -0400 schrieb Robert Carr: Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? ... a week or so! What a long read... phew. But thanks for the update, Robert! Looks like this whole issue will turn out well after all. I'm happy to see this unfolding. Best

[compiz] Beryl and Compiz Merge: What's actually going on?

2007-03-25 Thread Robert Carr
Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? Recently Quinns post to the beryl-dev mailing list entitled 'Merge on' has led to a lot of discussion, some of which has been good and some of which has led to a lot of misinformation, to clear things up I'd like to give the story of the merge, and