David Reveman wrote:
Thanks,
you were not returning TRUE after successfully updating the mode option
I'm stupid, it was corrected, don't know why i don't get it in final version.
and I didn't like the way you used a macro to get the work area in each
placement function.
Yes, it was bad,
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:42 +0100, Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
Le mercredi 28 février 2007, David Reveman a écrit :
I can't download this patch anymore, could you please send it to me?
- David
The patch is here:
http://hibbert.univ-lille3.fr/~cbellegarde/Compiz/place.patch
Thanks,
you
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 19:28 +0100, Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
Le mercredi 7 février 2007 17:44, Bellegarde Cedric a écrit :
When do i have to use this for aFunctionName() and when do i have to use
this for a_function_name() ?
After looking at others plugins, NEVER! :)
So, here is complete
Le jeudi 8 février 2007, Bellegarde Cedric a écrit :
http://forum.go-compiz.org/viewtopic.php?p=3783
Seems to be buggy in multihead, but i can't test here ...
http://puffy.homelinux.org/~gnumdk/compiz/patch/place.patch
I modify my patch following mcook idea for multihead.
Le mercredi 7 février 2007 17:44, Bellegarde Cedric a écrit :
When do i have to use this for aFunctionName() and when do i have to use
this for a_function_name() ?
After looking at others plugins, NEVER! :)
So, here is complete version of my placement patch, it include:
- Some code cleanup,
Le mercredi 7 février 2007, Bellegarde Cedric a écrit :
I think it works, tell me if you have problems with it!
One day i will be able to send a good patch the first time ;)
So, after looking at place.c, it seems that also variables use this_notation.
So, here the patch without code cleanup, i
On Thursday 08 February 2007 01:00:09 Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
And now, i put the patch on my server, it will me prevent me to send you a
message everytime i find something to fix ;)
http://puffy.homelinux.org/~gnumdk/compiz/patch/place.patch
http://forum.go-compiz.org/viewtopic.php?p=3783
