On Wednesday 13 May 2009 03:08:02 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 01:41:21 you wrote:
> > > Wil,
> > >
> > > You got me here. What do you mean EXA v. XAA? How do I change to
> > > test? I have tested both the radeon and radeonh drivers and can't tell
> > > much o
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 01:41:21 you wrote:
> >
> > Wil,
> >
> > You got me here. What do you mean EXA v. XAA? How do I change to
> > test? I have tested both the radeon and radeonh drivers and can't tell
> > much of a difference, if any. You also suggest trying the xf86-video-ati.
> > Is i
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
wrote:
> On Saturday 09 May 2009 10:49:50 you wrote:
>
>>
>> Cool. I suspect this is the just the compiz default, why I have no idea.
>>
>> The fglrx driver is typically faster than either open source drivers
>> in 3D, but I'll take th
On Saturday 09 May 2009 10:49:50 you wrote:
>
> Cool. I suspect this is the just the compiz default, why I have no idea.
>
> The fglrx driver is typically faster than either open source drivers
> in 3D, but I'll take the performance hit over a binary blob any day.
> I noticed in your logs you are
