I've got a system experiencing this, making Unity unusable. There are no
schemas under /usr/local, so that's not the issues. Let me know if there
is anything I can do you help debug this further.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is
Public bug reported:
$ setsid unity
compiz (core) - Info: Loading plugin: core
compiz (core) - Info: Starting plugin: core
unity-panel-service: no process found
compiz (core) - Info: Loading plugin: ccp
compiz (core) - Info: Starting plugin: ccp
compizconfig - Info: Backend : gsettings
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 963872 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963872
Public bug reported:
Latest compiz update has cause a large amount of screen flickers when
ever an animation occurs or even hovering over the unity launcher.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 963872 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963872
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 963872
Precise 12.04: experiencing mad flickering after the most recent Compiz
update to version 0.9.7.2
--
You received this bug notification because you
I'm seeing this as well. I've reported a new bug and marked it as a
duplicate just to include the apport collected information. See bug
#963872
@mc-return: Could you please run apport-collect 963872 in a terminal.
This will automatically attach system information to this bug report
that can help
Low seems a strange priority for a bug which prevents users from setting
up an email account on the default installation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752040
Title:
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio has proposed merging
lp:~andrewsomething/compizfusion-plugins-extra/natty into
lp:~compiz/compizfusion-plugins-extra/ubuntu.
Requested reviews:
compiz packagers (compiz)
Related bugs:
#693637 New upstream release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693637
For more
Three months to review a one line patch that was even spec'd at UDS-L.
Oh well...
@ Nigel:
You tagged this patch-needswork. Could you please elaborate on what
needs work? The currently proposed branch doesn't touch upstream code at
all. It patches debian/metacity-common.gconf-defaults. I suppose
8 matches
Mail list logo