What appears to be happening is that the side-by-side tiling code is
getting activated during resize. My understanding is that the side-by-
side option is only supposed to show when a window has been picked up by
its title bar and dragged to the left or right edges.
In which case the
I wonder if this is the difference between Unity and Unity 2D. On Unity
2D Super+d simply shows the launcher.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851741
Title:
Super + D
Public bug reported:
This could be transient, but I'm now seeing a double window-resize
following each Alt-tab completion. Eg.
1. Alt-tab to move away
2. Alt-tab to move back.
What happens:
3. Window raises.
4. Window resizes (local menu appearing briefly)
5. Window resizes second
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil J. Patel (njpatel)
** Summary changed:
- Double resize following alt-tab
+ Desktop staging PPA: Double resize following alt-tab (u-p-s crash?)
** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) = unity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861710
Title:
[regression] smspillaz fails to sleep at proper hours, despite solar
status
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
Ideally, when Compiz crashes, it should not kill the audio track that is
playing in Banshee.
** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed
According to bug #821505, this is still not fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820266
Title:
CTRL+ALT+T doesn't open a terminal anymore
To manage notifications
Hadmut: I have filed the issue about Apport and lagging mirrors as bug
#845754 now that you've raised it; and subscribed you to it. Hopefully
Martin Pitt can have a look into what is happening.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is
Confirmed as not working in Unity-2D at all though.
** Also affects: unity-2d
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825230
Title:
Public bug reported:
Compiz uses a crazy amount of CPU, continiously, even with nothing
showing except the Launcher and a terminal:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
11143 sladen20 0 521m 185m 13m S 24 6.2 80:45.20 compiz
the side-effect
Public bug reported:
Bug #160311 (Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult)
seems to be back with the change of themeing system.
Application windows are once again very hard to resize, with only the
1-pixel border working.
Ideally the external resize-padding shipped in Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 815643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 815643
Ctrl-Tab conflicts with local tab switching
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed
Omer, to reproduce:
sudo apt-get install openbve
openbve
Alt-Tab away from the dialogue; then Alt-Tab back to Openbve
What happens:
1. It is impossibly to use Alt-Tab to get back to the Openbve dialogue
2. it is possible to use the Unity Launcher (click the anonymous program
called
I've had this with a few other Apps (vanishes from Alt-Tab, but still in
the Launcher). Thanks for pinning it down to something reproducible!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
Chris: for clarity, are you thinking rescaled icons (to avoid a size
difference), or ensuring that we actually have redrawn 128x128 (or
whatever) icons specifically at that size.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in
Sam: how much would it be to just draw icons at their native size. Eg.
if the source icon is 32x32 or 48x48 and the available viewport is
128x128 we just draw it tiny in the middle?
I think the objection here is the scaling (+ resulting jaggies) itself.
--
You received this bug notification
** Summary changed:
- compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client
+ compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape
** Summary changed:
- compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape
+ compiz crashed on initial load of Java Citrix Client/Inkscape in
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None = lucid-updates
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu Maverick)
Milestone: None = maverick-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
Thanks Chris and Vish for testing this. I've also run the proposed
backport of:
http://cgit.compiz.org/compiz/core/commit/?id=30a92d8a060d79181a28840d7c66428ef431200c
Sam Spilsbury who is happy with the patch and so on that basis I'm
prepared to re-sign Chris' upload attempt on that basis.
Please. No. This fix/workaround to the four-year broken Alt-Tab handling
in Compiz was only uploaded 3 days ago. See bug #175874.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750283
Conflicts with various cancelled SRUs and newer packages:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu15.1 (lucid)
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu15.2 (lucid)
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.8.4-0ubuntu16 (maverick)
Per pitti's
** Summary changed:
- Focused window loses resizable sides and large shadow when 69 pixels wide
+ Resize padding: Tiny focused windows lose resize padding and shadow when 69
pixels wide
** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Reproduce more simply with:
1. Ctrl-Alt-t (open in new Terminal)
2. Resize it as small as you can (the resize padding borders have gone and
all that remains is the 1px border... which will disappear with a new upload of
bug #733233 anyway).
This will likely be down to the code that is
** Tags added: watchdog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716462
Title:
Unity is not restored on unity/compiz crash: compiz doesn't register
properly with gnome-session
Description copied from dup, I think the window placement code is right,
but the addition of the shade frame (then being see by the Launcher as
part of the window) is what is initiating the hide:
Starting with a clean desktop and launching a single application (eg.
Ctrl-Alt-t for a Terminal)
Over the weekend this has been happening fairly reliably within the
first ~10 minutes of usage; (just attach gdb after you login and leave
it running):
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb76eb880 (LWP 2697)):
#0 0x0805bbfe in ?? ()
#1 0x008c5088 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT () from
Got this this time:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
window_closed (screen=0x9286810, win=0x93532a0) at
/build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/wnck.c:722
722 /build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/wnck.c: No
such file or
(gdb) frame
#0 0x0805c145 in draw_decor_list (data=0x0)
at
/build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/decorator.c:686
686 in
/build/buildd/compiz-0.9.4/unity/unity_window_decorator/src/decorator.c
Null pointer. Great.
--
You received this bug notification because
Haven't pin it down completely; my observation is that an Alt-Tab causes
a stack /exchange/; if the working set are entries 1 and 2 in the stack
Alt-Tab therefore does as expected. If in the mean-time you've opened
another 10 terminals or windows and your desired working set are entries
1 and 10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 175874 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 175874
shift switcher should keep track of order like application switcher
* You can subscribe to bug 175874 by following this link:
Mmmm, 3 years. I guess we really should try to fix this if we're going
to push compiz out to everyone by default for Ubuntu 11.04.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist = High
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in:
I was reading the various parts of the switcher code on the train today,
and doing some testing with:
for i in $(seq 12) ; do pango-view --font 'Ubuntu 200' --text $i
done
it appears that the very act of Alt-Tabbing is changing the stack
ordering, by causing each window to be momentarily
I'm bumping this up to High again; it breaks 25 years of predictable
(LIFO) stack operation using Alt-tab across all major competitor
operating systems, and all previous Ubuntu releases.
(If it gets set to Medium/Low again, I will accept that judgment and not
change it further).
** Summary
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: compiz-fusion-plugins-main
- In compiz-fusion, the Shift Switcher has a strange way of keeping track
- of windows. Let's say I have ten windows open, numbered in order of
- which I've used most recently (1 being most recent).
+ In compiz-fusion,
At the very least, the preview should show the ratio of the minimised
window as a box (Otto, comment #22). But really a representation of the
window needs cacheing before it is destroyed. Bear in mind that if the
user alt-tabs past that minimised window even for a second then it *is*
going to be
** Summary changed:
- compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion
`b = 0' failed.
+ Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43:
bytes_per_pixel: Assertion `b = 0' failed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Martin: maybe it's too much RAM, try taking some out ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745
Title:
Alt-tab causes compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43:
Stanislaw, Corona: patches welcomed!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150690
Title:
Can't drag a window to another workspace
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 684745 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684745
The bug I've duped this against should have a more complete stracktrace.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 684745
compiz assert failure: compiz: main/mipmap.c:43: bytes_per_pixel: Assertion
Martin: I was getting about four crashes per day on Alt-Tab until I
upgraded the RAM from 1GB to 3GB, I suspect it's partly
starvation/paging related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
Keith: if you're interested, the general resizing is hard issue is bug
#160311; hopefully it's going to finally get nailed for this cycle.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
After hitting this, dropping to a terminal (Ctrl-Alt-F1) allows login,
followed by typing 'unity' to restart compiz.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: compiz
+ Compiz occasionally crashes, leaving open windows where they are. Mouse
+ input works, Keyboard does not work (except for Caps-lock and Ctrl-
+ Alt-F*).
Compiz crashed in ordinary Unity session. Keyboard was then unresponsive
while
According to a comment on the dup, this has already been fixed in trunk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683100
Title:
gnome-panel applets crashing with compiz 0.9
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683100 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683100
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683100
gnome-panel applets crashing with compiz 0.9
* You can subscribe to bug 683100 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83786 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83786
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 83786
[apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
* You can subscribe to bug 83786 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 83786 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83786
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 86750
[apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 83786
[apport] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
* You can
With what Omer suggests, you should then be able to go
System-Administration-Login and change the default session.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685325
Title:
Gnome
Travis: the stuff that's trying to be toned down/eliminated here is all
the stuff that creates a perception of lag or delay in the Alt-tab
process and which prevents interactions feeling clickity-click snappy.
Based on the last two comments here (#13 and #14), I've tried two
things:
a.
The disparity in latency with respect to key press-and-release speed is
bug #684871. In comment #7 above I had managed to link back to /this/
bug report...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in ubuntu.
Sam, is there a better (eg. numerical) setting that can be adjusted to
disable the fade, or to reduce it to under 0.0-0.1 seconds? I suspect
the wish here is not to remove core fade functionality completely, but
to just disable it by default in the case of staticswitcher.
Because this is marked
Confirming, this was picked up as a side issue in the process of
investigating bug #683635.
In the extreme case of this, the paging in of the images can cause
swapping issues.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
Also discovered in breaking down bug #683635, to reproduce:
1. Hit hit Alt-tab tab tab tab tab really really fast
2. and then do it it again slightly slower
The first responds near instantly, and the second can lag for several
seconds. It
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
Also discovered in breaking down bug #683635, to reproduce:
1. Hit hit Alt-tab tab tab tab tab really really fast
2. and then do it it again slightly slower
The first responds near instantly, and the second can lag for several
seconds. It
** Summary changed:
- Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session
+ Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: compains that
Window Manager does not respond
** Summary changed:
- Compiz hangs on logout / doesn't integrate with gnome-session: compains that
Reproducible:
1. Fresh login
2. Open Terminal #1
3. Open Firefox #1
4. Open Terminal #2
5. Open Firefox #2
6. Open Terminal #3
7. Open Firefox #3
8. Open Terminal #4
9. Press+hold Alt-Tab for the first time
Expected results: stack is alternate Terminal/Firefox.
Actual result:
Slight variation on the plugins not loading, although I can't see
anything OpenGL/3D driver related per se:
$ compiz --replace
...
compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'decoration'
compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'png'
compiz (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'svg'
compiz
57 matches
Mail list logo
