One more puzzle: this processor is rated at 2.4GHz,
but cpuinfo tells a different story:
It's because SpeedStep is working. You can stop it in BIOS setting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpeedStep
Thanks! I've the same CPU and just discovered mine is running at 1.6Ghz
too! For linux users
Hi Peter,
Following is my (Tokyo, Japan) data. Tough I'm not familiar with
network, the latency seems greater than 250 ms, right?
-Hideki
$ tracepath 208.100.19.102
1: 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 10.849ms
2: softbank219186009254.bbtec.net (219.186.9.254)
Thomas Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Don Dailey wrote:
If we don't like the rules, we can talk about changing them in order to
get behavior that fits our sensibilities better.But we have been
over this ground many times before. It seems like the only reasonable
way to properly
David Fotland wrote:
Japanese rules. I know people on this list don't like them, but the game
plays out almost the same as with Chinese rules, but since there is a one
point penalty for playing inside your own territory, the game ends much
earlier.
The real issue on a server that
Robert Jasiek wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
This raises an interesting (to me) theoretical question: is there a
ruleset that allows games to end in a more reasonable time without
changing general play?
There is no such rule-set that I know of.
If it is specified more clearly what end in a
Don Dailey wrote:
you can never solve the problem of a
malicious opponent who wants to prolong the game needlessly.
I solved that many years ago: Constant game end rule.
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/endrules.html
The question is rather whether one wants such a rule. (I do not like it
because
I have to correct this slightly.
Don Dailey wrote:
Just for fun I thought of a simple protocol for ending the game earlier
that I think would work:
Each program, when it sends it's move to the server can optionally send
2 lists of dead stones to the server. The first list represents the
On Jan 3, 2008 10:46 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the KGS rules gives only 1 chance to agree. At one point KGS
allowed this to happen repeatedly, but it cause some bots to infinite
loop on the server when they disagreed. So I think it's better than
nothing, but imperfect.
On Jan 3, 2008 10:21 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Jasiek wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
you can never solve the problem of a
malicious opponent who wants to prolong the game needlessly.
I solved that many years ago: Constant game end rule.
Jason House wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 10:21 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Jasiek wrote:
Don Dailey wrote:
you can never solve the problem of a
malicious opponent who wants to prolong the game needlessly.
I solved
--- 208.100.19.102 ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 19 received, 13% packet loss, time 21134ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 327.380/352.887/425.192/25.698 ms
this is really pretty darn good, given the setup.
the primary delay inbetween japan and the US is the speed of light
delay
John Tromp wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 10:46 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the KGS rules gives only 1 chance to agree. At one point KGS
allowed this to happen repeatedly, but it cause some bots to infinite
loop on the server when they disagreed. So I think it's better than
CGOS uses Chinese scoring with play-outs so that we can get fully
automated scoring with no chance of errors.
No chance of errors is vacuously true. Errors, if any, were made
in the playout leading to the final state. There can be score
differences compared to what would have been Japanese
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:25:00PM -0800, David Fotland wrote:
Japanese rules. I know people on this list don't like them, but the game
plays out almost the same as with Chinese rules, but since there is a one
point penalty for playing inside your own territory, the game ends much
earlier.
I
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:30 -0800, Dave Dyer wrote:
CGOS uses Chinese scoring with play-outs so that we can get fully
automated scoring with no chance of errors.
No chance of errors is vacuously true. Errors, if any, were made
in the playout leading to the final state.
errors is probably
Dave Dyer wrote:
CGOS uses Chinese scoring with play-outs so that we can get fully
automated scoring with no chance of errors.
No chance of errors is vacuously true. Errors, if any, were made
in the playout leading to the final state. There can be score
differences compared to
Jason House wrote:
I missed [...] the part about
solving how to end the game in an elegant way.
elegant is an aspect of art, and I have not studied it profoundly in
relation to rules yet because I concentrate on things that can be
derived from definitions and evaluated by objective
Robert Jasiek wrote:
Jason House wrote:
I missed [...] the part about
solving how to end the game in an elegant way.
elegant is an aspect of art, and I have not studied it profoundly in
relation to rules yet because I concentrate on things that can be
derived from definitions and
steve wrote a few paragraphs:
--- 208.100.19.102 ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 19 received, 13% packet loss, time 21134ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 327.380/352.887/425.192/25.698 ms
this is really pretty darn good, given the setup.
the primary delay inbetween japan and the US is
19 matches
Mail list logo
