Alain Baeckeroot wrote:
> Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
>
>> 2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
>>> > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
>>> > level 11 (which is 7
Le vendredi 22 février 2008, Sylvain Gelly a écrit :
> 2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> > > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> > > level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer)
I'm going to do a private autotest with just the first 6 levels or so -
to see if I get the same bend. I will leave out gnugo for the time
being to see what happens.If I don't get a bend, I will try adding
gnugo in a fresh test.
- Don
Harald Korneliussen wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
>
>>
Don Dailey wrote:
>
> It's also interesting how the graph up to level 11 seems to form 2 very
> straight lines, almost as if they were connected at an angle.
>
> This must be a by-product of how we started the test. We played only
> the first 4 levels as we were testing the system and that is where
2008/2/22, Alain Baeckeroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> > If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> > level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
> > 59.43 X longer.
> >
>
> So if we plot 9X9 r
Le jeudi 21 février 2008, Don Dailey a écrit :
> If you look at the table you will notice that going from level 4 to
> level 11 (which is 7 doublings and should take 128X longer) only takes
> 59.43 X longer.
>
So if we plot 9X9 rank vs time, maybe we have a straight line :)
ELO vs size of the t
