Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:41 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
The only exception is the "ridiculous invasion"
scenario that started this thread--that's the only case that I have seen
in which the "virtual"ness of the playout matters.
That's a gross simplification and untrue. C
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:41 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
> I teach informal territory rules with "virtual" play out. However in
> practice, I should note, the difference between territory rules with
> *actual* (not virtual) playout and area rules with actual playout ends
> up being identical. The o
Ian Osgood wrote:
> I no longer see CrazyStone nor GoLois in the list of participants for
> 19x19. I do hope Chen Zhixing decides to enter HandTalk.
It's surprising CrazyStone is gone, as Remi's talk is still listed. What
happened? It should have been a podium candidate.
By the way, there is a
First move is easy, but depending upon ratio of diameter to length
of torus, ladders can get complicated.
Cheers,
David
On 19, Sep 2008, at 10:48 AM, Álvaro Begué wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would go on a torus be interesting? There are not
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would go on a torus be interesting? There are not corners or edges, the
> sides of the board simply wrap around.
>
> - Don
Yes, it's probably similar in spirit to regular go, except everything
feels like the center of the bo
Would go on a torus be interesting? There are not corners or edges, the
sides of the board simply wrap around.
- Don
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:52 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
> Urban Hafner wrote:
> > Ah, right. I thought you were talking about implementing this feature
> > for your own program. Per
Urban Hafner wrote:
Ah, right. I thought you were talking about implementing this feature
for your own program. Personally I don't know of any program that
supports rectangular boards.
There was a recent thread on GoDiscussions about this topic:
http://www.godiscussions.com/forum/showthread.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
> I did not know about the notion SZ[m:n] for rectangular boards.
>
> And neither do at least some publicly available Go programs.
> I tried to enter SZ[3:5] into ManyFaces (version 10) and
> in Leela, without success. They simpl
Dear Urban,
thx for the quick reply.
>> does there exist a generalisation of the sgf-format
>> for rectangular board sizes?
>
> What exactly do you mean by generalization? You can
> use SZ[1] to define the size of your rectangular board.
>
> [1] http://www.red-bean.com/sgf/properties.html#SZ
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does there exist a generalisation of the sgf-format
> for rectangular board sizes?
What exactly do you mean by generalization? You can use SZ[1] to define
the size of your rectangular board. And then your are done, a
Hello,
does there exist a generalisation of the sgf-format
for rectangular board sizes?
The background of my question is that I would like
to try how MCTS works on small boards, and there
are not so many quadratically ones... (For instance,
I am eager to see what happens on 7x5-board.)
By the wa
11 matches
Mail list logo
