Jason House wrote:
> I also think the hardware for HBotSVN may be wrong, but I'll let Urban
> confirm.
That's true. HBotSVN ran on the same type of hardware as Housebot (even
though the two computers are at different ends of the world), namely
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+
Urb
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 23:21 -0400, Joshua Shriver wrote:
> Is the source available would be neat to see.
Yes, get it here: http://cgos.boardspace.net/public/javabot.zip
It includes a unix style simple Makefile.
For you java programmers: I'm sure you won't like it - I'm not a java
programmer
Is the source available would be neat to see.
-Josh
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a reference bot and I want someone(s) to help me check it out
> with equivalent data from their own program. There are no guarantees
> that I have this correct of
A minor correction in the GTP ref-score command. Score is not from
blacks point of view, but from the point of view of the player who's
turn to move it is.
- Don
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:14 -0400, Don Dailey wrote:
> I made a reference bot and I want someone(s) to help me check it out
> with e
I made a reference bot and I want someone(s) to help me check it out
with equivalent data from their own program. There are no guarantees
that I have this correct of course.
Doing 1 million play-outs from the opening position I get the following
numbers for various komi:
playouts:1,000,000
On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Nick Wedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The results of yesterday's KGS bot tournament are now available at
http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/43/index.html
As always, I look forward to your corrections.
You give HBotSVN too much credit in the round 8 open game. Seki i
2008/10/14 Nick Wedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The results of yesterday's KGS bot tournament are now available at
> http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/43/index.html
Formal division round 1 position has a technical name, you may want to
mention it:
http://senseis.xmp.net/?SendingTwoReturningOne
--
Se
The results of yesterday's KGS bot tournament are now available at
http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/43/index.html
As always, I look forward to your corrections.
Nick
--
Nick Wedd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-g
I think I already add a 13, so you must mean 14 :-)
- Don
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:48 -0400, steve uurtamo wrote:
> sorry to be pedantic, but:
>
> 13. Chinese scoring.
>
> s.
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 13:33 +0100, Cla
Nick's remarks about teaching computer programs which they understand rang a
bell.
Recently, I operated a beta version of MFG12 at the Cotsen tournament. It
appears to have a very strong tendency to stake out a large center territory.
If the players permit this to be solidified, MFG wins. But i
sorry to be pedantic, but:
13. Chinese scoring.
s.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 13:33 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>> I have a rough idea of what that might be. And I suspect that keeping
>> this
>> "de facto standard" implicit has
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Dailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
< snip >
I've always thought Joseki for computers is pretty dicey, but I'm not
really qualified to judge this well as I don't play go.But perhaps
joseki is nothing more that a pattern database to suggest moves and you
st
Don, thanks for providing these statistics!
Overall it suggests that on CGOS White only has a small advantage. I
still don't like this, but it is not nearly as bad as I initially
suspected.
The initially decreasing percentages are somewhat puzzling. One might
speculate that up to a certain level
13 matches
Mail list logo
