there are 2 points:
1. for research reasons, provided all the entrants were open source and
full disclosure. John McCarthy (the father of AI) pointed out many years
ago (footage featured in my movie "computer Go to come"), it would be like
a one-design sailboat competition, so that it would be t
There is an easy way to enforce computational limits. Ask everyone to run on
an identical AWS instance. Nevertheless, I’m against identical hardware
tournaments except as a special rare exception.
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
David Doshay
Sent
You could what they do in bridge tournaments, and provide two sets of results
from the same tournament.
Hardware would be unrestricted for everyone
The Open result would include all participants, exactly as today.
A "single machine" result would only include participants that ran on a single
n
Hi Nick,
If you are to limit hardware in one tournament, I would prefer that it
is not the slow tournament. The slow tournament is interesting because
it pushes programs to their limits.
Rémi
On 10/10/2015 07:28 PM, Nick Wedd wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their interest and responses. The s
On 10/10/2015 18:30, David Doshay wrote:
I agree completely that there is no way to enforce computational limits over
the internet.
I am against ‘identical hardware’ tournaments because people have worked to get
their programs working on the hardware they have, and some people will be on
th
I still like the idea of "1 Desktop/Notebook" for the lowspec category.
And what is the point? Comparability. How are you comparing your "research
results" if it is not clear, if the advantage comes from an hardware
advantage or from your newly developed algorithms? If tried to improve the
aerodyna
I agree completely that there is no way to enforce computational limits over
the internet.
I am against ‘identical hardware’ tournaments because people have worked to get
their programs working on the hardware they have, and some people will be on
the other side of any hardware decision, Mac v.
Thanks to everyone for their interest and responses. The second and third
questions are easy: I shall keep the zeroes in the "annual" table, and I
shall update the crosstable after each round whenever this is convenient
for me. I really don't feel qualified to contribute to question 1, the
"limi
I second Peter's response.
On Oct 10, 2015 10:33 AM, "Peter Drake" wrote:
> I'm also for no limits, if only because there's no way to enforce them.
>
> If there is to be a limited division, I'd like to see all programs run on
> identical hardware.
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Hiroshi Yamas
I'm also for no limits, if only because there's no way to enforce them.
If there is to be a limited division, I'd like to see all programs run on
identical hardware.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> I'd like no limit. Restriction will lose a chance of mass
10 matches
Mail list logo
