Le 05/01/2017 à 07:37, Robert Jasiek a écrit :
> On 04.01.2017 22:08, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
>> humanity's last hope
>
> The "last hope" are theoreticians creating arcane positions far
> outside the NN of AlphaGo so that its deep reading would be
> insufficient compensation! Another chance is lon
On 04.01.2017 22:08, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
humanity's last hope
The "last hope" are theoreticians creating arcane positions far outside
the NN of AlphaGo so that its deep reading would be insufficient
compensation! Another chance is long-term, subtle creation and use of aji.
--
robert jasi
Yes. I’m travelling this week, but when I get home I can look for it. I’m not
sure I can find the old source backups to make a gtp version.
David
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
Álvaro Begué
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 4:48 PM
To: computer-
The players and the results (in Chinese):
第01局:Magist(P)执白 v. 满汉(P)(棋手真名不详),白中盘胜
第02局:Magist(P)执白 v. 燕归来(P)(棋手真名不详),白中盘胜
第03局:圣人(P)(棋手真名不详)执白 v. Magist(P),黑中盘胜
第04局:Magist(P)执白 v. 卧虎(P)(谢尔豪 ),白中盘胜
第05局:无痕(P)(於之莹)执白 v. Magist(P),黑中盘胜
第06局:翱翔(P)(李翔宇)执白 v. Magist(P),黑中盘胜
第07局:重逢时(P)(棋手真名不详)执白 v. Magi
Yes, it is AlphaGo. I am relieved that DeepMind clarified this.
Honestly I got a little frustrated that many people didn't think that
was AlphaGo. It was almost clear to me because I know the difficulty of
developing AlphaGo-like bots.
I hope Aja can comment here, also about GodMoves :)
Yamato
_
Would you be willing to make the executable of mfgo1998 available so we can
run it locally? Or even better, something with the same engine but which
speaks GTP?
Álvaro.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:32 PM, "Ingo Althöfer" <3-hirn-ver...@gmx.de>
wrote:
> Like in every year, the reminder on my Han
https://games.slashdot.org/story/17/01/04/2022236/googles-alphago-ai-secretively-won-more-than-50-straight-games-against-worlds-top-go-players
--
Honesty is a very expensive gift. So, don't expect it from cheap people -
Warren Buffett
http://tayek.com/
Well, now that we all know the Master was AlphaGo after all, the downtime
is not so critical anymore. :-)
Take your time and thank you for your effort in keeping the server working.
Cheers
Lukas
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Rémi Coulom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All the SGF posts by Andries were clas
On 2017-01-04 at 21:41, Richard Lorentz wrote:
> Having fallen a bit out of the loop can somebody please update me (us?) a
> little on these 60 games. How strong were the opponents? Are some/most/all
> actually pros? What was the time control? What is the Foxwq server?
Many 9d pros, among the
Like in every year, the reminder on my Handicap-29 prize:
http://www.althofer.de/handicap-29-prize.html
I think, AlphaGo in its current form would not have a chance to cash in ;-)
Ingo.
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://com
I think it was mentioned that Master was playing all of its moves in almost
exactly 5-second increments, even trivial forcing move responses, which was
one of the things that led people to believe it was an AI. If that's true,
AlphaGo was basically playing under a time-handicap.
On Wed, Jan 4, 201
Hi Richard,
> ... can somebody please update me (us?) a
> little on these 60 games. How strong were
> the opponents?
they were all strong pro players. Ke Jie (humanity's last hope
in the eyes of several go players) also played three of the
games.
Thinking times were small base times plus 3
Having fallen a bit out of the loop can somebody please update me (us?)
a little on these 60 games. How strong were the opponents? Are
some/most/all actually pros? What was the time control? What is the
Foxwq server?
Thank you very much!
-Richard
On 01/04/2017 12:07 PM, David Ongaro wrote:
After this unbelievable streak of 60 won games (even though we still have to
see how it holds up with longer time control) it’s not completely unthinkable
anymore to play top pros with a handicap. Sadly because the Komi is fixed for
the value network it seems the next bigger handicap is 2 stones
Hello guys,
what shall I say.
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Januar 2017 um 16:11 Uhr
> Von: Janzert
> ...
> On 1/2/2017 7:05 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
> > Hello Paweł, ...
> Looks like we have an official answer in the affirmative
> https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/816660463282954240
Th
Tysvm for posting that!
I had predicted it was AlphaGo from the beginning. If there is a competitor
emerging, I think we would have seen some sort of publicity around it, if
not just to provoke a response with the AlphaGo team.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Janzert wrote:
> On 1/2/2017 7:05
On 1/2/2017 7:05 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote:
Hello Paweł,
There have been another 8 games on Foxwq server:
...
Totally, 38-0. It looks like a kind, indirect (yet powerful), message
from DeepMind to Chinese Go Association: "Please, let us try a real
challenge, like 3-handicap games, it does not r
17 matches
Mail list logo