On 30-01-18 20:59, Álvaro Begué wrote:
> Chrilly Donninger's quote was probably mostly true in the 90s, but
> it's now obsolete. That intellectual protectionism was motivated by
> the potential economic profit of having a strong engine. It probably
> slowed down computer chess for decades, until th
Chrilly Donninger's quote was probably mostly true in the 90s, but it's now
obsolete. That intellectual protectionism was motivated by the potential
economic profit of having a strong engine. It probably slowed down computer
chess for decades, until the advent of strong open-source programs.
Parado
Hi,
GCP wrote:
> ...
> > Of course, in the end, strength is the best way to tell that your
> > implementation is correct :)
>
> In other words, do not take "correct" as necessarily meaning "matching
> the published research".
Chrilly Donnninger, one of the computer chess gurus in the 1990's an
On 30-01-18 02:50, Brian Lee wrote:
> We're not aiming for a top-level Go AI; we're merely aiming for a
> correct, very readable implementation of the AlphaGoZero algorithm
I had a look around to see how you resolved what I'd consider the
ambiguities in the original paper:
https://github.com/gcp/
Dear Brian,
thank you for your posting and for publishing
the MiniGo code.
> I'm happy to announce MiniGo is now open source.
> https://github.com/tensorflow/minigo
>
> We're ... aiming for a correct, very readable implementation
> of the AlphaGoZero algorithm and demonstration of Google
> Clo
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce MiniGo is now open source.
https://github.com/tensorflow/minigo
We're not aiming for a top-level Go AI; we're merely aiming for a correct,
very readable implementation of the AlphaGoZero algorithm and demonstration
of Google Cloud / Kubernetes / TensorFlow. (T
