Well, I'd argue there is nothing inherently superior about copying the
human natural processes, instead of using our intellect to find a way to
achieve better results in simpler ways. Humans were also not born with
domain over tools, or fire, do you suppose there are two kinds of
people, the
Gonçalo wrote, "Well, I'd argue there is nothing inherently superior about
copying the human natural processes..."
I couldn't agree more! What inspires me about biological evolution is it's
fantastic use of temporal accretion compression; i.e. DNA viewed as
fractals. Given that meta-"natural
it rather depends on what you think AI is all about and what you want to
achieve.
there are two kinds of people in the world: those who are curious, and
those who just want to make yet another cloned ticky-tacky mousetrap so
they can compete on the Go playing-field because they're no good at
