Re: [computer-go] AMAF Scalability study + Responses to previous

2008-10-09 Thread Christoph Birk
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Denis fidaali wrote: tCan we degrade performances more with more simulations ? :) How does 5000AMAF fares agains 1AMAF, i wonder. Although i'm more interested about the upscales that the downscales :) I tried 50k vs 10k and saw no further improvement (no degradation eit

Re: [computer-go] AMAF Scalability study + Responses to previous

2008-10-09 Thread Claus Reinke
>>What about that claim that "the program could figure out the rule by itself"? >I made experiments with no-go-knowledge. (no eye knowledge). Any random player that accurately avoids suicide seems to need an awful lot of Go knowledge implicitly: - liberties (or at least pseudo-liberties, since we

[computer-go] AMAF Scalability study + Responses to previous

2008-10-09 Thread Denis fidaali
PS : how can i do so that my response to this mailing-list will be correctly indented ? (for example i would have liked to set this one as a response to my previous post). I have made some experiments with my AMAF implementation. It is both an attempt at understanding how the beast scales,