On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Denis fidaali wrote:
tCan we degrade performances more with more simulations ? :) How
does 5000AMAF fares
agains 1AMAF, i wonder. Although i'm more interested about the
upscales that the downscales :)
I tried 50k vs 10k and saw no further improvement (no degradation
eit
>>What about that claim that "the program could figure out the rule by itself"?
>I made experiments with no-go-knowledge. (no eye knowledge).
Any random player that accurately avoids suicide seems to need an awful lot
of Go knowledge implicitly:
- liberties (or at least pseudo-liberties, since we
PS : how can i do so that my response to this mailing-list will be correctly
indented ?
(for example i would have liked to set this one as a response to my previous
post).
I have made some experiments with my AMAF implementation. It is both an
attempt at understanding how the beast scales,