Hi Bob,
No problem at all ... it was inevitable that this would happen. I just
found that the Oregonian, which printed that I wrote GNU Go, properly
changed it to SlugGo in the on line version.
What I am trying to understand now is how the New Scientist technology
blog has me properly quo
Well you can blame me for linking to the AGA story on Slashdot, but at
least I didn't repeat the misquote, and I also asked Chris to fix it
on the AGA site. I figured it would probably make Slashdot quickly
anyway, so the story might as well be written by someone with at least
a bit of a cl
> the mistaken comment (9 stones in a year, computer superiority real soon)
> is getting repeated a huge number of times.
>
As one of my computer science teacher said: "if your editor has the
copy/paste feature, throw it away".
It obviously applies to programming and apparently to publication as
I had asked Chris to print the correction, and he was glad to do so.
Now I am trying to get the article on the AGA web site updated. I have
already seen a bunch of things on the internet that link to it and the
mistaken comment (9 stones in a year, computer superiority real soon)
is getting
Just in case anyone hadn't seen the correction yet...
*
CORRECTION: *The EJ misquoted David Doshay in our 8/7 report on "Computer
Beats Pro At U.S. Go Congress." "What I said is that computer programs have
improved 7 to 9 stones in the last few years, [not "We've improved nine
stones in just a year
