Rémi Coulom wrote:
> 荒木伸夫 wrote:
>> I have considered this, and I think that this may be caused by wrong
>> training model. In my master thesis, I mentioned that the
>> relationship between
>> top 1 accuracy of move prediction and the strength of Monte-Carlo
>> is not simple (I increased the nu
荒木伸夫 wrote:
I have considered this, and I think that this may be caused by wrong
training model.
In my master thesis, I mentioned that the relationship between
top 1 accuracy of move prediction and the strength of Monte-Carlo
is not simple (I increased the number of matches to 600, and simila
Hi,
I would like to confirm your experiments: I have noticed already that
adding shapes of radius > 4 improves prediction a lot, but does not
improve playing strength (from progressive widening).
Also, even worse than that, for a given set of features, the pattern
urgencies computed by MM ar
荒木伸夫 wrote:
Hello, Coulom. I'm Nobuo Araki.
Thank you for reading my thesis. However, this thesis is first version, not final
version. Therefore, there are too few experiments. And Mr. Hideki Kato sent me many
warnings about this thesis, for example "English is too bad." You may be
confused w
