On Jan 23, 2008 3:44 AM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is still nonsense. UCT in actual real world "PRACTICE" responds
> dramatically to more hardware, how can you say it's not clear whether
> it's scalable in practice?
In fairness, he didn't say that. What he said was that our b
ivan dubois wrote:
> Thanks !
> I think I agree with everything you said.
> After some reasoning, I changed my opinion about the practical scalability of
> Mogo. It does have some missconceptions about eyes, but as you said, it can
> be corrected by the UCT part. I tried to find a situation w
n 30s
Objet : Re: Re : Re : [computer-go] Is MC-UCT really scalable ... is a troll
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, ivan dubois wrote:
> When people say that MC infinite scalability is mathematicaly proven,
> they do not refer to the definition you give, they refer to the
> definition I used.
No,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, ivan dubois wrote:
When people say that MC infinite scalability is mathematicaly proven,
they do not refer to the definition you give, they refer to the
definition I used.
No, they don't. At least not most people on this list.
Christoph
___
